Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448965›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Observing movement disorders: best practice proposal in the use of video recording in clinical practice.

Luisa Sambati, Luca Baldelli, Giovanna Calandra Buonaura, Sabina Capellari, Giulia Giannini, Cesa Lorella Maria Scaglione, Massimo Armaroli, Elena Zoni, Pietro Cortelli, Paolo Martinelli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Video-Based Data-Driven Models for Diagnosing Movement Disorders: Review and Future Directions.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luisa SambatiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Luca BaldelliIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanna Calandra BuonauraDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Sabina CapellariDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia GianniniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Cesa Lorella Maria ScaglioneIRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Massimo ArmaroliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Elena ZoniDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Pietro CortelliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo MartinelliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Unit of Neurology, Bellaria Hospital, University of Bologna, Via Altura, 3, 40139, Bologna, Italy. paolo.martinelli@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2409-5329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evaluation is of utmost importance in the semeiological description of motor disorders which often require video recording to highlight subtle signs and their subsequent evolution. After reviewing 1858 video recordings, we composed a suitable list of video-documentation maneuvers, classified semeiologically in the form of a "video recording protocol", to guarantee appropriate documentation when filming movement disorders. Aware that our proposed filming protocol is far from being exhaustive, by suggesting a more detailed documenting approach, it could help not only to achieve a better definition of some disorders, but also to guide neurologists towards the correct subsequent examinations. Moreover, it could be an important tool for the longitudinal evaluation of patients and their response to therapy. Finally, video recording is a powerful teaching tool as visual teaching highly improves educational training.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicBiomechanical PhenomenaDocumentationEducation, MedicalHumansMovement DisordersVideo RecordingMovement disordersProtocolSemeiologicalVideo recording

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.