Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448925›Full record

ArticleChromosoma2019

Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution.

Rebecca E O'Connor, Lucas Kiazim, Ben Skinner, Gothami Fonseka, Sunitha Joseph, Rebecca Jennings, Denis M Larkin, Darren K Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosoma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Satellite DNA evolution in Tytonidae (Aves: Strigiformes): dynamic repeat landscapes despite conserved karyotypes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bridging methodological gaps in avian cytogenetics: comprehensive and optimized protocols for chromosomal preparation in birds.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The genome of a globally invasive passerine, the common myna, Acridotheres tristis.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reptile Evolution and Genetics: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Three amphioxus reference genomes reveal gene and chromosome evolution of chordates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebecca E O'ConnorSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK. r.o'connor@kent.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-970X
Lucas KiazimSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK.
Ben SkinnerDepartment of Pathology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, CB2 1QP, UK.
Gothami FonsekaCytocell Ltd, 3-4 Technopark Newmarket Road Cambridge, Cambridge, CB5 8PB, UK.
Sunitha JosephSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK.
Rebecca JenningsSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK.
Denis M LarkinDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London, NW1 0TU, UK.
Darren K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NJ, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E010652/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008161/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K008226/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure and organization of a species genome at a karyotypic level, and in interphase nuclei, have broad functional significance. Although regular sized chromosomes are studied extensively in this regard, microchromosomes, which are present in many terrestrial vertebrates, remain poorly explored. Birds have more cytologically indistinguishable microchromosomes (~ 30 pairs) than other vertebrates; however, the degree to which genome organization patterns at a karyotypic and interphase level differ between species is unknown. In species where microchromosomes have fused to other chromosomes, they retain genomic features such as gene density and GC content; however, the extent to which they retain a central nuclear position has not been investigated. In studying 22 avian species from 10 orders, we established that, other than in species where microchromosomal fusion is obvious (Falconiformes and Psittaciformes), there was no evidence of microchromosomal rearrangement, suggesting an evolutionarily stable avian genome (karyotypic) organization. Moreover, in species where microchromosomal fusion has occurred, they retain a central nuclear location, suggesting that the nuclear position of microchromosomes is a function of their genomic features rather than their physical size.

Indexed as

GenomePhylogenySyntenyAnimalsBiological EvolutionBirdsChromosome PaintingChromosomesKaryotypingRecombination, GeneticSpecies SpecificityAvianConservationEvolutionGenomeMicrochromosome

Identifiers

PMID30448925
PMCPMC6394684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.