Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448885›Full record

ReviewAdvances in therapy2018

Cyclodestructive Procedures in Glaucoma: A Review of Current and Emerging Options.

Anna I Dastiridou, Andreas Katsanos, Philippe Denis, Brian A Francis, Dimitrios G Mikropoulos, Miguel A Teus, Anastasios-Georgios Konstas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. The pseudo plateau iris: A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna I Dastiridou2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Andreas KatsanosDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Philippe DenisUniversity Department of Ophthalmology, Lyons, France.
Brian A FrancisDoheny and Stein Eye Institutes, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dimitrios G Mikropoulos3rd University Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Miguel A TeusDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario "Principe de Asturias", Universidad de Alcalá, Alcala De Henares, Spain.
Anastasios-Georgios Konstas1st and 3rd University Departments of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. konstas@med.auth.gr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first surgical modalities to reduce aqueous humor production by damaging the ciliary body date back to the early twentieth century. Until recently, however, cyclodestructive procedures (e.g., cyclocryotherapy and transscleral diode laser photocoagulation) have been reserved as last option procedures in refractory glaucoma patients with poor visual potential. Emerging technologic innovation has led to the development of promising, safer and less destructive techniques, such as micropulse diode cyclophotocoagulation, endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation and ultrasound cyclodestruction. Consequently, an emerging paradigm shift is under way with the selection of these surgical options in eyes with less severe glaucoma and good visual potential. Although existing evidence has not, as yet, adequately defined the role and value of these procedures, their emergence is a welcome expansion of available options for patients with moderate-to-severe glaucoma. This article reviews the pertinent evidence on both established and evolving cyclodestructive techniques and describes their growing role in the management of glaucoma.

Indexed as

Aqueous HumorCryotherapyEndoscopyGlaucomaHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansIntraocular PressureLaser CoagulationLasers, SemiconductorLight CoagulationOphthalmologic Surgical ProceduresSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeCyclocryotherapyCyclodestructionCyclophotocoagulationDiode laserEndoscopic photocoagulationHigh-intensity focused ultrasoundMicropulse diodeOphthalmologyRefractory glaucomaUltrasound cyclodestruction

Identifiers

PMID30448885
PMCPMC6267695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.