Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448880›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Dietary intake of (poly)phenols in children and adults: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme (2008-2014).

Nida Ziauddeen, Alice Rosi, Daniele Del Rio, Birdem Amoutzopoulos, Sonja Nicholson, Polly Page, Francesca Scazzina, Furio Brighenti, Sumantra Ray, Pedro Mena

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Optimization of anJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nida Ziauddeen *MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8964-5029
Alice Rosi *Human Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8533-797X
Daniele Del RioHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy. daniele.delrio@unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5394-1259
Birdem AmoutzopoulosMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8571-9561
Sonja NicholsonMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, UK.
Polly PageMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, UK.
Francesca ScazzinaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5372-8658
Furio BrighentiHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-4611
Sumantra RayMRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, 120 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge, CB1 9NL, UK. sr506@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1411-0003
Pedro MenaHuman Nutrition Unit, Department of Food and Drugs, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, 43125, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2150-2977
MRC Human Nutrition Research · GBUniversity of Parma · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council U1059600384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent evidence accounts for the role of (poly)phenolic compounds in the prevention of non-communicable diseases. Detailed information on population-level intakes is required to translate these findings into recommendations. This work aimed to estimate (poly)phenol intake in the UK population using data from a nationally representative survey.

methodsData from 9374 participants (4636 children aged 1.5-18 years and 4738 adults aged 19 years and over) from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme (NDNS RP) 2008-2014 was used. (Poly)phenol content of foods consumed in the NDNS RP was identified using Phenol-Explorer and through literature searches. Data on flavonoids, phenolic acids, and stilbenes were collected. Total (poly)phenol content was also assessed.

resultsMean total (poly)phenol intake ranged from 266.6 ± 166.1 mg/day in children aged 1.5-3 years to 1035.1 ± 544.3 mg/day in adults aged 65 years and over, with flavan-3-ols and hydroxycinnamic acids being the most consumed (poly)phenols across all age groups. (Poly)phenol intake was higher in males in all age groups except for adults aged 19-34 and 50-64 years, where intakes were marginally higher in females. Energy-adjusted intakes accounted for the pattern of increasing (poly)phenol intakes with age and a higher intake was observed in females across all age groups, with the exception of children aged 1.5-3 years. The main food sources were non-alcoholic beverages and fruits, being the main compounds flavan-3-ols and caffeoylquinic acids.

conclusionsThis analysis provides estimates of (poly)phenol intake from a representative sample of the UK general population, which can help inform the health implications of (poly)phenol intake.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPhenolsPolyphenolsSex FactorsPhenolsPolyphenolsDietary intakeFlavonoidFood sourceNDNSPolyphenol

Identifiers

PMID30448880
OpenAlexW2901414222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.