Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448878›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2019

Consumption of a dark roast coffee blend reduces DNA damage in humans: results from a 4-week randomised controlled study.

Dorothea Schipp, Jana Tulinska, Maria Sustrova, Aurelia Liskova, Viera Spustova, Miroslava Lehotska Mikusova, Zora Krivosikova, Katarina Rausova, Andrew Collins, Vaineta Vebraite and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. DNA Protection by an Aronia Juice-Based Food Supplement.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorothea SchippStatistical Consulting, Pirnaer Str. 1, 01824, Rosenthal-Bielatal, Germany. kontakt@ds-statistik.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-786X
Jana TulinskaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Maria SustrovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Aurelia LiskovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Viera SpustovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Miroslava Lehotska MikusovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Zora KrivosikovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Katarina RausovaFaculty of Public Health, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Andrew CollinsNorgenotech AS, Skreia, Norway.
Vaineta VebraiteNorgenotech AS, Skreia, Norway.
Katarina VolkovovaNorgenotech AS, Skreia, Norway.
Eva RollerovaFaculty of Public Health, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Magdalena BarancokovaMedical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Sergey ShaposhnikovNorgenotech AS, Skreia, Norway.
Slovak Medical University · SKStatistisches Bundesamt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the DNA protective effects of a standard coffee beverage in comparison to water consumption.

methodsThe single-blind, randomised controlled study with parallel design included healthy women (n = 50) and men (n = 50) recruited from the general Central European population. The subjects were randomised in a coffee and a control group, with stratification for sex and body mass index. The study comprised two periods of 4 weeks: a preconditioning period, with daily consumption of at least 500 ml water but no coffee, nor tea, nor any other caffeine-containing product. During the subsequent intervention period the coffee group consumed 500 ml of freshly brewed dark roast coffee blend per day, the control group consumed water instead. On the last day of each period, blood was drawn and analysed by comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) to assess the level of DNA damage (strand breakage).

resultsAt the end of the intervention period the mean level of DNA strand breaks in the coffee group has decreased in comparison to the control group [difference in means 0.23% TI (tail intensity), p = 0.028]. The mean change from baseline (delta value) was - 23% in the coffee group (p = 0.0012). Effects of coffee intake were similar for men and women. During intervention, neither group showed any significant change in body weight or calorie intake.

conclusionsOur results indicate that regular consumption of a dark roast coffee blend has a beneficial protective effect on human DNA integrity in both, men and women.

Indexed as

CoffeeAdultCookingDNA DamageEuropeFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleSingle-Blind MethodCoffeeCoffeeComet assayDNA damageDNA strand breaksHuman intervention study

Identifiers

PMID30448878
OpenAlexW2900744175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.