ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018
Comparison of Combination Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Plus High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Alone for Massive Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basis and prospects of radiotherapy combined with high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma larger than 5 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Molecular Imaging Enhances High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation on Liver Cancer With B7-H3-Targeted Microbubbles.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Tissue Ablation: Applications and Perspectives.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Prognostic Significance of Tumor Growth Rate (TGR) in Patients with Huge Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation for Unresectable Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancer: Real-World Research in a Chinese Tertiary Center With 275 Cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation is a non-invasive treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, ablative radiotherapy is administered to tumors in targeted, limited doses to minimize damage to nearby tissues. We evaluated the outcomes and survival of patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (singular therapy) versus those receiving combination thermal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (combination therapy). MATERIAL AND METHODS We compared data of 160 patients with massive hepatocellular carcinomas (12.5-18 cm) who were treated with combination therapy to those treated with singular therapy between January 2009 and February 2016. RESULTS Eighty-four patients were treated with single therapy while 76 were treated with combination therapy. Comparison of short-term outcomes and long-term survival between the groups revealed no significant differences in adverse events. In the combination group, the proportions of patients with complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were 52.6%, 21.1%, 21.1%, and 5.3%, respectively; in the single therapy group, the corresponding rates were 0%, 23.8%, 50%, and 26.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates in the combination group were 33%, 20%, and 13%, respectively, while those in the single therapy group were 21%, 14%, and 1%, respectively. These data indicated no differences in complications between the groups except for a significantly higher level of skin edema in the combination group (P=0.015). CONCLUSIONS Combination therapy is more effective than single therapy for the treatment of massive hepatocellular carcinomas, although rates of most complications appear to be similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.