Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448734›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

A Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Model for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Renal Tumors.

Leilei Zhou, Zuoheng Zhang, Yu-Chen Chen, Zhen-Yu Zhao, Xin-Dao Yin, Hong-Bing Jiang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05782400 (Multiomics Approach for Patients Stratification and Novel Target Identification in Metastatic Clear Renal Cell Carcnoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05782400 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Multiomics Approach for Patients Stratification and Novel Target Identification in Metastatic Clear Renal Cell Carcnoma

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2023 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsMetastatic Clear Cell Renal CarcinomaArmsCT scan, Plasma collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Deep Convolutional Backbone Comparison for Automated PET Image Quality Assessment.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. CT-based conventional radiomics and quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant renal lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leilei ZhouDepartment of Medical Equipment, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Zuoheng ZhangState Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Bio materials and Devices, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Yu-Chen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China. Electronic address: chenyuchen1989@126.com.
Zhen-Yu ZhaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Xin-Dao YinDepartment of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China.
Hong-Bing JiangDepartment of Medical Equipment, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210006, China; Nanjing Health Information Center, Nanjing 210003, China. Electronic address: cmdjhb@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the effect of transfer learning on computed tomography (CT) images for the benign and malignant classification on renal tumors and to attempt to improve the classification accuracy by building patient-level models.

methodsOne hundred ninety-two cases of renal tumors were collected and identified by pathologic diagnosis within 15 days after enhanced CT examination (66% male, 70% malignant renal tumors, average age of 62.27 ± 12.26 years). The InceptionV3 model pretrained by the ImageNet dataset was cross-trained to perform this classification. Five image-level models were established for each of the Slice, region of interest (ROI), and rectangular box region (RBR) datasets. Then, two patient-level models were built based on the optimal image-level models. The network's performance was evaluated through analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and five-fold cross-validation.

resultsIn the image-level models, the test results of model trained on the Slice dataset [accuracy (ACC) = 0.69 and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) = 0.45] were the worst. The corresponding results on the ROI dataset (ACC = 0.97 and MCC = 0.93) were slightly better than those on the RBR dataset (ACC = 0.93 and MCC = 0.85) when freezing the weights before the mixed6 layer. Compared with the image-level models, both patient-level models could discriminate better (ACC increased by 2%-5%) on the RBR and Slice datasets.

conclusionsDeep learning can be used to classify benign and malignant renal tumors from CT images. Our patient-level models could benefit from 3D data to improve the accuracy.

Identifiers

PMID30448734
PMCPMC6299150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.