Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30448002›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2019

Survival impact of radiotherapy interruption in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A big-data intelligence platform-based analysis.

Ji-Jin Yao, Fan Zhang, Tian-Sheng Gao, Wang-Jian Zhang, Wayne R Lawrence, Bao-Ting Zhu, Guan-Qun Zhou, Jun Ma, Si-Yang Wang, Ying Sun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Effect of endoscopic surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy on prognosis of early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients in high incidence area].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji-Jin YaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Fan ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China.
Tian-Sheng GaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, PR China.
Wang-Jian ZhangDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, United States.
Wayne R LawrenceDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, United States.
Bao-Ting ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China.
Guan-Qun ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China.
Jun MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China.
Si-Yang WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, PR China. Electronic address: 13570608929@163.com.
Ying SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, PR China. Electronic address: sunying@sysucc.org.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USWuzhou Red Cross Hospital · CN

Funding

The Endowment for Community-based Health Disparities Research and TrainingS21MD010692 · NIMHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI RODRIGUEZ, HAVIDAN, SCHELL, LAWRENCE M · 2016 to 2020
$10.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD010692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the effect of radiotherapy interruption (RTI) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 7826 patients using the well-established big-data intelligence platform were identified. Computer-generated random numbers were used to assign these patients into a training cohort (n = 3913 patients) and an internal validation cohort (n = 3913 patients). RTI was defined as the difference between radiation treatment time and planned radiation time (assuming a Monday start). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method for survival, and log-rank test to evaluate difference. Optimal RTI threshold was identified using the recursive partitioning analyses (RPAs). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Weibull model. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

resultsThe optimal threshold of RTI with respect to OS in the training cohort was 6.5 d based on RPAs. Therefore, a uniform threshold of 7 d (<7 vs. ≥7 d) was selected to classify both training and validation cohorts into high and low RTI groups for survival analysis. RTI of ≥7 d showed significant detrimental effects on OS in both training (5-y OS, 82.4% vs 86.5%; P = 0.001) and validation cohorts (5-y OS, 85.2% vs 86.7%; P = 0.013) than those patients with RTI of <7 d. Consistent with results of the univariate analysis, RTI of ≥7 d was found to be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS in both training (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.95; P = 0.003) and validation cohort (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.65; P = 0.031). Subgroup analysis showed that RTI of ≥7 d had significant adverse effects on prognosis of NPC patients receiving IMRT, regardless of TNM stage and chemotherapy (P < 0.05 for all).

conclusionsIn the IMRT era, RTI independently influences survival. Raising RTI ≥ 7 d was consistently unfavorable for NPC survival. Medical practitioners must remind patients on the importance of minimizing RT interruptions.

Indexed as

AdultBig DataChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSurvival AnalysisIntensity-modulated radiotherapyNasopharyngeal carcinomaOptimal thresholdPrognostic impactRadiotherapy interruption

Identifiers

PMID30448002
PMCPMC12883213
OpenAlexW2901314139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.