Trial reportClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2019
Individual risk assessment tool for school-age asthma prediction in UK birth cohort.
Trial report in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individual risk assessment tool for school-age asthma prediction in UK birth cohort.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019Trial
- Early Prediction of Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Predicting Treatment Outcomes Using Explainable Machine Learning in Children with Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent published asthma predictive tools have moderate positive likelihood ratios (+LR) but high negative likelihood ratios (-LR) based on their recommended cut-offs, which limit their clinical usefulness.
objectiveTo develop a simple clinically applicable asthma prediction tool within a population-based birth cohort.
methodChildren from the Manchester Asthma and Allergy Study (MAAS) attended follow-up at ages 3, 8 and 11 years. Data on preschool wheeze were extracted from primary-care records. Parents completed validated respiratory questionnaires. Children were skin prick tested (SPT). Asthma at 8/11 years (school-age) was defined as parentally reported (a) physician-diagnosed asthma and wheeze in the previous 12 months or (b) ≥3 wheeze attacks in the previous 12 months. An asthma prediction tool (MAAS APT) was developed using logistic regression of characteristics at age 3 years to predict school-age asthma.
resultsOf 336 children with physician-confirmed wheeze by age 3 years, 117(35%) had school-age asthma. Logistic regression selected 5 significant risk factors which formed the basis of the MAAS APT: wheeze after exercise; wheeze causing breathlessness; cough on exertion; current eczema and SPT sensitisation(maximum score 5). A total of 281(84%) children had complete data at age 3 years and were used to test the MAAS APT. Children scoring ≥3 were at high risk of having asthma at school-age (PPV > 75%; +LR 6.3, -LR 0.6), whereas children who had a score of 0 had very low risk(PPV 9.3%; LR 0.2).
conclusionMAAS APT is a simple asthma prediction tool which could easily be applied in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.