ReviewFolia microbiologica2019
Methods for quantification of growth and productivity in anaerobic microbiology and biotechnology.
Review in Folia microbiologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Effect of Ginger-Derived Nanovesicles on the Growth and Metabolic Activity ofJournal of extracellular biology · 2026Article
- A high-pressure bioreactor system for the cultivation of Methanothermobacter marburgensis on advanced growth media for sustainable energy applications.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Standardizing Bacterial Extracellular Vesicle Purification: A Call for Consensus.Journal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Novel Respirometry Measurement and Comparison of Monod Kinetic Constants and Methanogen Concentrations for 27 Full-Scale Anaerobic Bioreactors.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025Article
- Constraints in temperature adaptation reinforce differences in thermal niche between mesophilic and psychrotolerantProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Fermentative production of vitamin BFood science & nutrition · 2024Review
- More than the sum of its parts: uncovering emerging effects of microbial interactions in complex communities.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Anoxygenic photosynthesis with emphasis on green sulfur bacteria and a perspective for hydrogen sulfide detoxification of anoxic environments.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Nisin and Organic Acid Salts Improved the Microbial Quality, Extended the Shelf Life, and Maintained the Sensory Attributes of Semidry Beef Luncheon Marketed at Adverse (35-40 °C) Ambient Summer Temperatures.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Various Reducing Agents for Methane Production byMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Electro-stimulation of tofu wastewater for the production of single cell protein from various microorganisms.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- Analysis of biomass productivity and physiology ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Sensors and Techniques for On-Line Determination of Cell Viability in Bioprocess Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Influence of cerium oxide nanoparticles on dairy effluent nitrate and phosphate bioremediation.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
- The Historical Development of Cultivation Techniques for Methanogens and Other Strict Anaerobes and Their Application in Modern Microbiology.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- System dynamics kinetic model for predicting biogas production in anaerobic condition: Preliminary assessment.Science progress · 2021Article
- Polyaza functionalized graphene oxide nanomaterial based sensor for Escherichia coli detection in water matrices.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Intestinal Microbiota and Perspectives of the Use of Meta-Analysis for Comparison of Ulcerative Colitis Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Low-Cost Clamp-On Photometers (ClampOD) and Tube Photometers (TubeOD) for Online Cell Density Determination.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaerobic microorganisms (anaerobes) possess a fascinating metabolic versatility. This characteristic makes anaerobes interesting candidates for physiological studies and utilizable as microbial cell factories. To investigate the physiological characteristics of an anaerobic microbial population, yield, productivity, specific growth rate, biomass production, substrate uptake, and product formation are regarded as essential variables. The determination of those variables in distinct cultivation systems may be achieved by using different techniques for sampling, measuring of growth, substrate uptake, and product formation kinetics. In this review, a comprehensive overview of methods is presented, and the applicability is discussed in the frame of anaerobic microbiology and biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.