Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30446860›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2019

The effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, fluoride, and CPP-ACP on caries resistance of primary enamel.

Pinar Serdar-Eymirli, M D Turgut, A Dolgun, A R Yazici

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In vitro comparative evaluation of physical and chemical properties of surface enamel after using APF and SDF with or without laser activation.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. In vitro controlled elemental analysis to evaluate the combined effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride with Er:YAG and diode lasers.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pinar Serdar-EymirliDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Altindağ, 06100, Ankara, Turkey. pinarserdar@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7568-326X
M D TurgutDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Altindağ, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
A DolgunSchool of Science, College of Science, Engineering and Health RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
A R YaziciHacettepe University Dental Laser Application and Research Center, Ankara, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TRRMIT University · AU

Funding

Hacettepe University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit TDK-2016-12277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the effect of different remineralization agents and laser on caries resistance of primary enamel. In the study, 150 sound primary molars were used. The initial microhardness values were measured and the teeth were randomly assigned to ten treatment groups (n = 15): no treatment/negative control (C), NaF, APF, fluoride varnish (FV), CPP-ACP, laser (L), L + NaF, L + APF, L + FV, L + CPP-ACP. The microhardness values were measured after the treatments and the pH cycle. The obtained data were analyzed statistically. One sample from each group was examined before treatment, after treatment, and after the pH cycle with a scanning electron microscope. While microhardness values after treatment compared to baseline increased, microhardness after the pH cycle decreased compared to after treatment values in all experimental groups (p < 0.05). In regard to the difference in microhardness after the pH cycle and baseline, there were no statistically significant differences between groups C and NaF and between C and CPP-ACP (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between groups L and L + FV (p < 0.05), while no significant difference was noted between groups L and L + NaF, L + APF, L + CPP-ACP (p > 0.05). As a conclusion, FV is more effective when used in combination with laser than laser alone. NaF, CPP-ACP, and laser may be insufficient in protecting the primary teeth against acid attacks compared to FV used with laser.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateCaseinsDental CariesDental EnamelFluoridesHardnessHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationTooth, Deciduouscasein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomplexCaseinsFluoridesCPP-ACPDental cariesFluorideLaser therapyTooth demineralizationTooth remineralization

Identifiers

PMID30446860
OpenAlexW2901310731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.