Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30446807›Full record

ArticleDer Anaesthesist2019

[Transfer of a cockpit strategy to anesthesiology : Clinical example: introduction of canned decisions to solve cannot intubate cannot oxygenate situations].

H Vogelsang, N M Botteck, J Herzog-Niescery, J Kirov, D Litschko, T P Weber, P Gude

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

H VogelsangKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland. h.vogelsang@klinikum-bochum.de.
N M BotteckKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
J Herzog-NiesceryKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
J KirovKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
D LitschkoKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
T P WeberKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.
P GudeKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivtherapie, Katholisches Klinikum Bochum, Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstraße 56, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety strategies in civil aviation are well-established. The authors present a possible structure for induction of anesthesia, which includes elements of the so-called cockpit strategy. The objective is to reduce anesthesia-related mortality caused by the unexpected difficult airway through early detection and solution of cannot intubate cannot oxygenate (CICO) situations.

methodsAfter approval by the responsible ethics committee, a prospective pilot study was conducted to analyze the process quality of uncomplicated induction of anesthesia on a simulator using audiovisual recording. An evaluation list with 44 items was created, which met the following requirements: items were dichotomous, accessible to an audiovisual evaluation and according to current scientific consensus should be considered during induction of anesthesia. Standard induction of anesthesia was supplemented by several crew resource management elements (cockpit strategy). Two canned decisions (CD, CD 1: end tidal CO

resultsThe cockpit strategy significantly improved the process quality during the simulated induction of anesthesia (78% vs. 36% items fulfilled), while the duration of induction was reduced by 36%. In the subsequent 6‑year study period, 7 CICO situations with emergency coniotomy occurred. All teams performed in accordance with the algorithm and with respect to the CDs. No patient suffered from hypoxia or any other damage.

conclusionThe transfer and implementation of a cockpit strategy in anesthesiology for improvement of patient safety is possible. The acceptance of the aviation safety strategy in medicine is a necessary prerequisite. A profound training in technical and non-technical skills and regular team training to solve CICO situations must be an integral part of advanced training in anesthesiology.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthesiologyHumansIntubation, IntratrachealPatient SimulationProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesCrew resource managementEmergency coniotomyPatient safetyUnexpected difficult airway

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.