ReviewDer Pathologe2018
[The German Mesothelioma Register : Current pathological diagnostics and services].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reactive mesothelial hyperplasia mimicking mesothelioma in an African green monkey (Primate biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, asbestos-related diseases (asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma) are recognised and compensated occupational diseases. The histologic diagnosis of mesothelioma is sometimes a challenge; additional immunohistochemical and molecular methods are needed. With lung dust analysis, the current asbestos fibre burden of the lung is measured (biomonitoring). Identification of grade I asbestosis (minimal asbestosis) requires directed histological examinations with up to 400-fold magnification, additional iron staining and possibly in connection with a lung dust analysis.
objectivesDemonstration of current pathologic diagnostics in association with mesothelioma and lung dust analysis. MATERIALS AND
methodsAnalysis of routine data from the German Mesothelioma Register.
resultsContrary to reactive mesothelial hyperplasia, malignant mesotheliomas have a nuclear BAP1 loss-of-expression in up to 66% of cases. For differential diagnosis between reactive versus malignant, a p16-FISH test may be helpful. BAP1 loss-of-expression and p16-deletion are independent markers. Evaluation of the dataset of the German Mesothelioma Register of patients with repeated tissue sampling proves the detection of asbestos fibres at the same level even after 40 years. The asbestos fibre burden in the human lung remains stable over this long period of time. In the electron microscopic analysis, white asbestos was predominantly found.
conclusionsThe well-known and industrially appreciated characteristics of asbestos fibres (in ancient ἄσβεστος asbestos "imperishable") as biopersistent have also been experimentally confirmed in human lungs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.