Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30446539›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2019

Object features and T4/T5 motion detectors modulate the dynamics of bar tracking by

Mehmet F Keleş, Jean-Michel Mongeau, Mark A Frye

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Odor tracking in flyingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Odor tracking in flyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fly eyes are not still: a motion illusion inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Visuomotor strategies for object approach and aversion inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehmet F KeleşDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.
Jean-Michel MongeauDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-6911
Mark A FryeDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7239, USA frye@ucla.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-3094
Johns Hopkins University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Neural circuits for visual feature detectionR01EY026031 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Mark Arthur Frye, Patrick A Shoemaker · 2016 to 2026
$3.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual objects can be discriminated by static spatial features such as luminance or dynamic features such as relative movement. Flies track a solid dark vertical bar moving on a bright background, a behavioral reaction so strong that for a rigidly tethered fly, the steering trajectory is phase advanced relative to the moving bar, apparently in anticipation of its future position. By contrast, flickering bars that generate no coherent motion or have a surface texture that moves in the direction opposite to the bar generate steering responses that lag behind the stimulus. It remains unclear how the spatial properties of a bar influence behavioral response dynamics. Here,  we show that a dark bar defined by its luminance contrast to the uniform background drives a co-directional steering response that is phase advanced relative to the response to a textured bar defined only by its motion relative to a stationary textured background. The textured bar drives an initial contra-directional turn and phase-locked tracking. The qualitatively distinct response dynamics could indicate parallel visual processing of a luminance versus motion-defined object. Calcium imaging shows that T4/T5 motion-detecting neurons are more responsive to a solid dark bar than a motion-defined bar. Genetically blocking T4/T5 neurons eliminates the phase-advanced co-directional response to the luminance-defined bar, leaving the orientation response largely intact. We conclude that T4/T5 neurons mediate a co-directional optomotor response to a luminance-defined bar, thereby driving phase-advanced wing kinematics, whereas separate unknown visual pathways elicit the contra-directional orientation response.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleOrientation, SpatialVisual PathwaysFeature detectionFly flightMotion visionTethered flightVisual behavior

Identifiers

PMID30446539
PMCPMC6361104
OpenAlexW2901973477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.