Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30446394›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2019

Integrated Mosquito Management: Is Precision Control a Luxury or Necessity?

Caroline Fouet, Colince Kamdem

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of Cup Material onPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Systematic Review on Diversity and Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caroline FouetDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
Colince KamdemDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA. Electronic address: colincek@ucr.edu.

Funding

Fine-Scale Recombination Rate Variation in Anopheles gambiaeR01AI113248 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI ATKINSON, PETER WILLIAM · 2014 to 2018
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI113248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The versatility of mosquito species that spread emerging arthropod-borne viruses such as Zika has highlighted the urgent need to re-evaluate mosquito-control standards. The prospect of using precise knowledge of the geographic distribution and vector status of local populations to guide targeted interventions has gained renewed attention, but the feasibility and utility of such an approach remain to be investigated. Using the example of mosquito management in the USA, we present ideas for designing, monitoring, and assessing precision vector control tailored to different environmental and epidemiological settings. We emphasize the technical adjustments that could be implemented in mosquito-control districts to enable targeted control while strengthening traditional management.

Indexed as

AnimalsCulicidaeMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsUnited StatesVirus Diseasesarbovirusesmosquito managementprecisionvector control

Identifiers

PMID30446394
PMCPMC6503858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.