Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30446003›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin have Clinical Utility and Cost-Effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Sam Eldabe, Ashish Gulve, Simon Thomson, Ganesan Baranidharan, Rui Duarte, Susan Jowett, Harbinder Sandhu, Raymond Chadwick, Morag Brookes, Anisah Tariq and 5 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04735159 (Development of a Predictive Model of Effectiveness for the Implantation of Electrical Neurostimulators in Patients With Chronic Pain Using Imaging Biomarkers Extracted From Magnetic Resonance), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04735159 nacompletednot on this map

Development of a Predictive Model of Effectiveness for the Implantation of Electrical Neurostimulators in Patients With Chronic Pain Using Imaging Biomarkers Extracted From Magnetic Resonance

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral University Hospital of ValenciaRan2016 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsFailed Back Surgery SyndromeArmsSCS implanted with Precision SpectraTM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cost-Effectiveness Model Shows Superiority of Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Without a Separate Trial.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sam EldabeThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Ashish GulveThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Simon ThomsonBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals, Basildon, UK.
Ganesan BaranidharanLeeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK.
Rui DuarteUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. rui.duarte@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-7415
Susan JowettUniversity of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Harbinder SandhuUniversity of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Raymond ChadwickUniversity of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK.
Morag BrookesThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Anisah TariqThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Jenny EarlePatient and Public Involvement Representatives, Middlesbrough, UK.
Jill BellPatient and Public Involvement Representatives, Middlesbrough, UK.
Anu KansalThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Shelley RhodesUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Rod S TaylorUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
James Cook University Hospital · GBMiddlesbrough College · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBTeesside University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0815-20028NIHR PB-PG-0815-20028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe TRIAL-STIM Study aims to assess the diagnostic performance, clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a screening trial prior to full implantation of a spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device. METHODS/

designThe TRIAL-STIM Study is a superiority, parallel-group, three-centre, randomised controlled trial in patients with chronic neuropathic pain with a nested qualitative study and economic evaluation. The study will take place in three UK centres: South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (The James Cook University Hospital); Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; and Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. A total of 100 adults undergoing SCS implantation for the treatment of neuropathy will be included. Subjects will be recruited from the outpatient clinics of the three participating sites and randomised to undergo a screening trial prior to SCS implant or an implantation-only strategy in a 1:1 ratio. Allocation will be stratified by centre and minimised on patient age (≥ 65 or < 65 years), gender, presence of failed back surgery syndrome (or not) and use of high frequency (HF10™) (or not). The primary outcome measure is the numerical rating scale (NRS) at 6 months compared between the screening trial and implantation strategy and the implantation-only strategy. Secondary outcome measures will include diagnostic accuracy, the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% and 30% pain relief at 6 months as measured on the NRS, health-related quality-of-life (EQ-5D), function (Oswestry Disability Index), patient satisfaction (Patients' Global Impression of Change) and complication rates. A nested qualitative study will be carried out in parallel for a total of 30 of the patients recruited in each centre (10 at each centre) to explore their views of the screening trial, implantation and overall use of the SCS device. The economic evaluation will take the form of a cost-utility analysis. DISCUSSION: The TRIAL-STIM Study is a randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative study and economic evaluation aiming to determine the clinical utility of screening trials of SCS as well as their cost-effectiveness. The nested qualitative study will seek to explore the patient's view of the screening trials, implantation and overall use of SCS.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN60778781 . Registered on 15 August 2017.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdolescentAdultAgedChronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisDisability EvaluationEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeuralgiaPain MeasurementSpinal Cord StimulationNeuropathic painRandomised controlled trialScreening trialSpinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30446003
PMCPMC6240171
OpenAlexW2901336696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.