Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445958›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2018

Assessing pharmacy student experience with, knowledge of and attitudes towards harm reduction: illuminating barriers to pharmacist-led harm reduction.

Lily Rowan Mahon, Amanda N Hawthorne, Julie Lee, Heather Blue, Laura Palombi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Acceptability of a Fentanyl Vaccine to Prevent Opioid Overdose and Need for Personalized Decision-Making.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Healthcare Professional Students' Perspectives on Substance Use Disorders and Stigma: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. "Innovations in pharmacy · 2021
    Article
  15. Report of the 2020 Special Committee on Substance Use and Pharmacy Education.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Readiness of community pharmacies to implement an opioid safety intervention.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lily Rowan MahonDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 232 Life Science, 1110 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812-3003, USA.
Amanda N HawthorneDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 232 Life Science, 1110 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812-3003, USA.
Julie LeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 232 Life Science, 1110 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812-3003, USA.
Heather BlueDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 232 Life Science, 1110 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812-3003, USA.
Laura PalombiDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Minnesota, College of Pharmacy, 232 Life Science, 1110 Kirby Drive, Duluth, MN, 55812-3003, USA. lpalombi@d.umn.edu.
University of Minnesota, Duluth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the burden from the opioid epidemic continues to increase in the state of Minnesota and across the nation, the University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy seeks to design an innovative, comprehensive harm reduction curriculum in order to better train student pharmacists to serve the varied needs of the greater community. This study examines incoming individuals' baseline knowledge of and attitudes toward harm reduction in order to better inform curriculum planning and to ultimately produce pharmacists capable of impacting the devastating effects of the opioid crisis.

methodsIncoming first-year pharmacy students took a survey focused on their knowledge of opioid overdose and the drug naloxone and also provided written reflections on their perceptions of harm reduction. Data was coded using consensual qualitative research (CQR) into appropriate domains.

resultsPharmacy students beginning their professional education revealed a lack of knowledge of proper response to an overdose situation, with 18.56% unfamiliar with the opioid antagonist drug naloxone. Close to 10% (9.58%) of students expressed unwillingness to do anything other than call an ambulance during an overdose event, while 8.98% were either unsure or felt that they would not feel compelled to do something to help. Qualitative coding revealed many barriers to students' becoming capable harm reductionists, including lack of knowledge of substance use, addiction, and harm reduction, in addition to the presence of bias and stigma.

conclusionIn order to interrupt the cycle of misinformation and stigma within the larger community and the subgroup of medical providers, gaps in student knowledge must be addressed in meaningful, specific ways over the course of their pharmacy education. Evaluating baseline knowledge and beliefs informs the design of a flexible, action-oriented curriculum to produce well-trained pharmacists ready to engage in finding solutions to the opioid crisis.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAnalgesics, OpioidDrug OverdoseHumansMinnesotaOpioid-Related DisordersStudents, PharmacySurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidEducationHarm reductionNaloxonePharmacy

Identifiers

PMID30445958
PMCPMC6240215
OpenAlexW2900970635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.