Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445702›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

DNA Vaccines-How Far From Clinical Use?

Dominika Hobernik, Matthias Bros

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 231 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
231citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

231 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 449 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Target, silence, replace: a review on RNA-based drugs in modern medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Personalizing DNA Cancer Vaccines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

171 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominika HobernikDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany. dhoberni@uni-mainz.de.
Matthias BrosDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany. mbros@uni-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1066 B05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two decades ago successful transfection of antigen presenting cells (APC) in vivo was demonstrated which resulted in the induction of primary adaptive immune responses. Due to the good biocompatibility of plasmid DNA, their cost-efficient production and long shelf life, many researchers aimed to develop DNA vaccine-based immunotherapeutic strategies for treatment of infections and cancer, but also autoimmune diseases and allergies. This review aims to summarize our current knowledge on the course of action of DNA vaccines, and which factors are responsible for the poor immunogenicity in human so far. Important optimization steps that improve DNA transfection efficiency comprise the introduction of DNA-complexing nano-carriers aimed to prevent extracellular DNA degradation, enabling APC targeting, and enhanced endo/lysosomal escape of DNA. Attachment of virus-derived nuclear localization sequences facilitates nuclear entry of DNA. Improvements in DNA vaccine design include the use of APC-specific promotors for transcriptional targeting, the arrangement of multiple antigen sequences, the co-delivery of molecular adjuvants to prevent tolerance induction, and strategies to circumvent potential inhibitory effects of the vector backbone. Successful clinical use of DNA vaccines may require combined employment of all of these parameters, and combination treatment with additional drugs.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsHumansNanoparticlesVaccinationVaccines, DNAVaccines, DNAadjuvantantigen presenting cellsdendritic cellDNA vaccinemacrophagenano carrierpromotortransgene

Identifiers

PMID30445702
PMCPMC6274812
OpenAlexW2900898034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.