Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445631›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Recruiting for a pragmatic trial using the electronic health record and patient portal: successes and lessons learned.

Emily Pfaff, Adam Lee, Robert Bradford, Jinhee Pae, Clarence Potter, Paul Blue, Patricia Knoepp, Kristie Thompson, Christianne L Roumie, David Crenshaw and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Implementation ofJournal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Embedding research study recruitment within the patient portal preCheck-in.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emily PfaffNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Adam LeeNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Robert BradfordNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jinhee PaeNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Clarence PotterNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Paul BlueNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Patricia KnoeppNC TraCS Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Kristie ThompsonCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Christianne L RoumieInstitute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Veteran's Administration, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
David CrenshawInstitute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Remy ServisInstitute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Darren A DeWaltDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ELASY, TOM A · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Querying electronic health records (EHRs) to find patients meeting study criteria is an efficient method of identifying potential study participants. We aimed to measure the effectiveness of EHR-driven recruitment in the context of ADAPTABLE (Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness)-a pragmatic trial aiming to recruit 15 000 patients. Materials and Methods: We compared the participant yield of 4 recruitment methods: in-clinic recruitment by a research coordinator, letters, direct email, and patient portal messages. Taken together, the latter 2 methods comprised our EHR-driven electronic recruitment workflow. Results: The electronic recruitment workflow sent electronic messages to 12 254 recipients; 13.5% of these recipients visited the study website, and 4.2% enrolled in the study. Letters were sent to 427 recipients; 5.6% visited the study website, and 3.3% enrolled in the study. Coordinators recruited 339 participants in clinic; 23.6% visited the study website, and 16.8% enrolled in the study. Five-hundred-nine of the 580 UNC enrollees (87.8%) were recruited using an electronic method. Discussion: Electronic recruitment reached a wide net of patients, recruited many participants to the study, and resulted in a workflow that can be reused for future studies. In-clinic recruitment saw the highest yield, suggesting that a combination of recruitment methods may be the best approach. Future work should account for demographic skew that may result by recruiting from a pool of patient portal users. Conclusion: The success of electronic recruitment for ADAPTABLE makes this workflow well worth incorporating into an overall recruitment strategy, particularly for a pragmatic trial.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient PortalsPatient SelectionHumansNorth CarolinaPragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID30445631
PMCPMC6308009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.