Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445510›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Evolution of the Mutational Process under Relaxed Selection in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Ayush Shekhar Saxena, Matthew P Salomon, Chikako Matsuba, Shu-Dan Yeh, Charles F Baer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Climate change and plant genomic plasticity.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  15. Evolution of developmental bias explains divergent patterns of phenotypic evolution in two nematode clades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayush Shekhar SaxenaDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Matthew P SalomonDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Chikako MatsubaDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Shu-Dan YehDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Charles F BaerDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

Evolutionary Causes and Consequences of Variation in the Rate of MutationR01GM072639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BAER, CHARLES F · 2006 to 2010
$1.5M
Determination of the distribution of fitness effects of mutations in C. elegansR01GM107227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BAER, CHARLES F · 2014 to 2017
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072639NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutational process varies at many levels, from within genomes to among taxa. Many mechanisms have been linked to variation in mutation, but understanding of the evolution of the mutational process is rudimentary. Physiological condition is often implicated as a source of variation in microbial mutation rate and may contribute to mutation rate variation in multicellular organisms.Deleterious mutations are an ubiquitous source of variation in condition. We test the hypothesis that the mutational process depends on the underlying mutation load in two groups of Caenorhabditis elegans mutation accumulation (MA) lines that differ in their starting mutation loads. "First-order MA" (O1MA) lines maintained under minimal selection for ∼250 generations were divided into high-fitness and low-fitness groups and sets of "second-order MA" (O2MA) lines derived from each O1MA line were maintained for ∼150 additional generations. Genomes of 48 O2MA lines and their progenitors were sequenced. There is significant variation among O2MA lines in base-substitution rate (µbs), but no effect of initial fitness; the indel rate is greater in high-fitness O2MA lines. Overall, µbs is positively correlated with recombination and proximity to short tandem repeats and negatively correlated with 10 bp and 1 kb GC content. However, probability of mutation is sufficiently predicted by the three-nucleotide motif alone. Approximately 90% of the variance in standing nucleotide variation is explained by mutability. Total mutation rate increased in the O2MA lines, as predicted by the "drift barrier" model of mutation rate evolution. These data, combined with experimental estimates of fitness, suggest that epistasis is synergistic.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetic LoadMutationAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic FitnessMicrosatellite RepeatsRecombination, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID30445510
PMCPMC6367967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.