Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445424›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2018

BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Arginine nutrition and metabolism in growing, gestating, and lactating swine.

Guoyao Wu, Fuller W Bazer, Gregory A Johnson, Yongqing Hou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel Aspects of the Physiology of Pregnancy in Domestic Ruminants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effect of supplementation withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Research progress on anti-stress nutrition strategies in swine.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Review
  18. PlasmaScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guoyao WuDepartments of Animal Science and of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Fuller W BazerDepartments of Animal Science and of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Gregory A JohnsonDepartments of Animal Science and of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
Yongqing HouHubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Animal Nutrition and Gut Health, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, China.
Texas A&M University · USWuhan Polytechnic University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arginine (Arg) has traditionally not been considered as a deficient nutrient in diets for gestating or lactating swine due to the assumption that these animals can synthesize sufficient amounts of Arg to meet their physiological needs. The lack of full knowledge about Arg nutrition has contributed to suboptimal efficiency of pork production. Over the past 25 yr, there has been growing interest in Arg metabolism in the pig, which is an agriculturally important species and a useful model for studying human biology. Arginine is a highly abundant amino acid in tissues of pigs, a major amino acid in allantoic fluid, and a key regulator of gene expression, cell signaling, and antioxidative reactions. Emerging evidence suggests that dietary supplementation with 0.5% to 1% Arg maintains gut health and prevents intestinal dysfunction in weanling piglets, while enhancing their growth performance and survival. Also, the inclusion of 1% Arg in diets is required to maximize skeletal muscle accretion and feed efficiency in growing pigs, whereas dietary supplementation with 1% Arg reduces muscle loss in endotoxin-challenged pigs. Furthermore, supplementing 0.83% Arg to corn- and soybean meal-based diets promotes embryonic/fetal survival in swine and milk production by lactating sows. Thus, an adequate amount of dietary Arg as a quantitatively major nutrient is necessary to support maximum growth, lactation, and reproduction performance of swine. These results also have important implications for improving the nutrition and health of humans and other animals.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPregnancy, AnimalAnimalsArginineFemaleLactationPregnancySwineArginine

Identifiers

PMID30445424
PMCPMC6276552
OpenAlexW2900614799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.