Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30445220›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018

An unsupervised and customizable misspelling generator for mining noisy health-related text sources.

Abeed Sarker, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Data-Driven Definition of "Complication" in Medicine.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Can accurate demographic information about people who use prescription medications nonmedically be derived from Twitter?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Generalizable Natural Language Processing Framework for Migraine Reporting from Social Media.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Methadone and suboxoneClinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abeed SarkerDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States. Electronic address: abeed@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Graciela Gonzalez-HernandezDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

Social Media Mining for PharmacovigilanceR01LM011176 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GONZALEZ HERNANDEZ, GRACIELA, SHEN, LI · 2012 to 2021
$4.5M
Mining Social Media Big Data for Toxicovigilance: Automating the Monitoring of Prescription Medication Abuse via Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning MethodsR01DA046619 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SARKER, ABEED H · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046619NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData collection and extraction from noisy text sources such as social media typically rely on keyword-based searching/listening. However, health-related terms are often misspelled in such noisy text sources due to their complex morphology, resulting in the exclusion of relevant data for studies. In this paper, we present a customizable data-centric system that automatically generates common misspellings for complex health-related terms, which can improve the data collection process from noisy text sources. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe spelling variant generator relies on a dense vector model learned from large, unlabeled text, which is used to find semantically close terms to the original/seed keyword, followed by the filtering of terms that are lexically dissimilar beyond a given threshold. The process is executed recursively, converging when no new terms similar (lexically and semantically) to the seed keyword are found. The weighting of intra-word character sequence similarities allows further problem-specific customization of the system.

resultsOn a dataset prepared for this study, our system outperforms the current state-of-the-art medication name variant generator with best F DISCUSSION: Our proposed spelling variant generator has several advantages over past spelling variant generators-(i) it is capable of filtering out lexically similar but semantically dissimilar terms, (ii) the number of variants generated is low, as many low-frequency and ambiguous misspellings are filtered out, and (iii) the system is fully automatic, customizable and easily executable. While the base system is fully unsupervised, we show how supervision may be employed to adjust weights for task-specific customizations.

conclusionThe performance and relative simplicity of our proposed approach make it a much-needed spelling variant generation resource for health-related text mining from noisy sources. The source code for the system has been made publicly available for research.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSocial MediaAlgorithmsData CollectionData MiningElectronic Health RecordsFuzzy LogicMedical InformaticsPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsClinical notesData scienceMisspelling generationNatural language processingSocial mediaSpelling variant generationText mining

Identifiers

PMID30445220
PMCPMC6322919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.