Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30444317›Full record

ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2019

Injectable Biodegradable Chitosan-Alginate 3D Porous Gel Scaffold for mRNA Vaccine Delivery.

Jingxuan Yan, Ruying Chen, Hong Zhang, James D Bryers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. A novel microporous biomaterial vaccine platform for long-lasting antibody mediated immunity against viral infection.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Comprehensive Review of mRNA Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Matrices Activated with Messenger RNA.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Review
  16. Emerging Progress of RNA-Based Antitumor Therapeutics.International journal of biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. mRNA vaccines: Past, present, future.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Nanocarrier-hydrogel composite delivery systems for precision drug release.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingxuan YanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-5061, USA.
Ruying ChenUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-5061, USA.
Hong ZhangUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-5061, USA.
James D BryersUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-5061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3332-3271
University of Washington · US

Funding

Biomaterials that Promote Infection ImmunityR01AI074661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRYERS, JAMES D. · 2008 to 2012
$2.5M
Anti-infective Biomaterials that Enhance Innate ImmunityR21AI132355 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRYERS, JAMES D. · 2017 to 2018
$401k
Biomaterials that Promote Infection ImmunityR56AI074661 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRYERS, JAMES D. · 2015 to 2015
$400k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 2R56AI074661-06National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases 5R01AI074661NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI074661NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI132355NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI074661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mRNA vaccines have proven to be more stable, effective, and specific than protein/peptide-based vaccines in stimulating both humoral and cellular immune response. However, mRNA's fast degradation rate and low-transfection efficiency in vivo impede its potential in vaccination. Recent research in gene delivery has focused on nonviral vaccine carriers and either implantable or injectable delivery systems to improve transgene expression in vivo. Here, an injectable chitosan-alginate gel scaffold for the local delivery of mRNA vaccines is reported. Gel scaffold biodegradation rates and biocompatibility are quantified. Scaffold-mediated mRNA in vivo transgene expression as well as ovalbumin antigen specific cellular and humoral immune responses are evaluated in vivo. Luciferase reporter protein expression resulting from mRNA lipoplex-loaded gel scaffolds is five times higher than systemic injection. Compared to systemic injections of naked mRNA or mRNA:lipoplexes, elevated levels of T cell proliferation and IFN-γ secretion are seen with in vivo scaffold-mediated mRNA lipoplex delivery. Furthermore, a humoral response (ovalbumin antigen specific IgG levels) is observed as early as week 1 for scaffold-mediated mRNA lipoplex delivery, while protein-based immunization did not elicit IgG production until 2 weeks post-injection. Results suggest that injectable scaffold mRNA vaccine delivery maybe a viable alternative to traditional nucleic acid immunization methods.

Indexed as

AlginatesAnimalsCell LineCell ProliferationChitosanDrug CarriersFemaleGelsImmunizationImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLuciferasesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOvalbuminAlginatesChitosanDrug CarriersGelsIFNG protein, mouseImmunoglobulin GInterferon-gammaLuciferasesOvalbuminRNA, MessengerVaccines, Syntheticbiodegradableinjectable immunizing scaffoldmRNA vaccine delivery

Identifiers

PMID30444317
PMCPMC6611697
OpenAlexW2900639711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.