Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30443883›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2019

Comparison of high-intensity laser therapy and combination of ultrasound treatment and transcutaneous nerve stimulation in patients with cervical spondylosis: a randomized controlled trial.

M Venosa, E Romanini, R Padua, S Cerciello

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05689788 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of High-intensity Laser Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain. Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuiropraxia y EquilibrioRan2024 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsNon-specific Chronic Neck PainArmsHigh-intensity laser therapy, Stretching exercise, Sham High-intensity laser therapy
NCT05852613 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of High Power Laser Therapy on Pain and Electrophysiological Study in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsCervical RadiculopathyArmshigh power laser therapy (HPLT), selected physical therapy program
NCT06664931 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Muscle Energy Versus Mulligan Techniques in Treating Patients With Cervical Spondylosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsCervical Spondylosis, Mulligan Mobilization, SNAGs, Muscle Energy TechniqueArmsGroup (A) Muscle Energy Technique (MET), Group (B) Mulligan Mobilizations Techniques (MMT).
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M VenosaArtrogruppo, Casa di cura San Feliciano, Rome, Italy. michelevenosa@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-1758
E RomaniniArtrogruppo, Casa di cura San Feliciano, Rome, Italy.
R PaduaGLOBE Italian Working Group on Evidence Based Orthopaedics, Rome, Italy.
S CercielloOrthopaedic Department, Casa di Cura Villa Betania, Rome, Italy.
Casa di Cura San Michele · ITEvidence (Italy) · ITIstituto S.Anna Crotone · ITPontifical University of St. Bonaventure · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) and a combination of ultrasound (US) treatment and transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain, range of motion (ROM), and functional activity in patients with cervical spondylosis (CS). A total of 84 patients with a mean age of 51.54 years (52 women and 32 men) affected by CS were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. In group A (42 subjects), patients received 12 sessions of HILT plus exercise, while in group B (42 subjects), they received a combination of US, TENS, and exercise. The outcomes measured were cervical segment ROM, pain level measured by visual analogue scale (VAS), and functional activity measured by neck disability index (NDI) at the end of the therapy. The level of statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. In the two groups, cervical ROM, VAS, and functional scores showed significant changes. Both HILT plus exercise and US/TENS plus exercise effectively increased cervical ROM and reduced pain (with a significant greater decrease in group A). Statistically significant differences in NDI scores were observed after treatment sessions with better results for participants enrolled in group A (HILT plus exercise) Both therapeutic modalities demonstrated analgesic efficacy and improved function in patients affected by cervical spondylosis 4 weeks after the therapy. HILT plus exercise was more effective than US/TENS plus exercise. HILT can be promoted and used in this pathology with positive outcomes. However, further studies are needed to optimize the dose and duration of HILT therapy.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUltrasonicsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedNeckRange of Motion, ArticularSpondylosisTreatment OutcomeVisual Analog ScaleCervical spondylosisDisabilityHigh-intensity laser therapyPainTranscutaneous nerve stimulationUltrasound treatment

Identifiers

PMID30443883
OpenAlexW2900681654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.