Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30443819›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

A Text Mining Pipeline Using Active and Deep Learning Aimed at Curating Information in Computational Neuroscience.

Matthew Shardlow, Meizhi Ju, Maolin Li, Christian O'Reilly, Elisabetta Iavarone, John McNaught, Sophia Ananiadou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew ShardlowThe National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Road, M13 9PL, Oxford, UK.
Meizhi JuThe National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Road, M13 9PL, Oxford, UK.
Maolin LiThe National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Road, M13 9PL, Oxford, UK.
Christian O'ReillyBlue Brain Project, EPFL, Campus Biotech, Ch. des Mines 9, CH-1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elisabetta IavaroneBlue Brain Project, EPFL, Campus Biotech, Ch. des Mines 9, CH-1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
John McNaughtThe National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Road, M13 9PL, Oxford, UK.
Sophia AnaniadouThe National Centre for Text Mining, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Road, M13 9PL, Oxford, UK. sophia.ananiadou@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4097-9191

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P025684/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The curation of neuroscience entities is crucial to ongoing efforts in neuroinformatics and computational neuroscience, such as those being deployed in the context of continuing large-scale brain modelling projects. However, manually sifting through thousands of articles for new information about modelled entities is a painstaking and low-reward task. Text mining can be used to help a curator extract relevant information from this literature in a systematic way. We propose the application of text mining methods for the neuroscience literature. Specifically, two computational neuroscientists annotated a corpus of entities pertinent to neuroscience using active learning techniques to enable swift, targeted annotation. We then trained machine learning models to recognise the entities that have been identified. The entities covered are Neuron Types, Brain Regions, Experimental Values, Units, Ion Currents, Channels, and Conductances and Model organisms. We tested a traditional rule-based approach, a conditional random field and a model using deep learning named entity recognition, finding that the deep learning model was superior. Our final results show that we can detect a range of named entities of interest to the neuroscientist with a macro average precision, recall and F1 score of 0.866, 0.817 and 0.837 respectively. The contributions of this work are as follows: 1) We provide a set of Named Entity Recognition (NER) tools that are capable of detecting neuroscience entities with performance above or similar to prior work. 2) We propose a methodology for training NER tools for neuroscience that requires very little training data to get strong performance. This can be adapted for any sub-domain within neuroscience. 3) We provide a small corpus with annotations for multiple entity types, as well as annotation guidelines to help others reproduce our experiments.

Indexed as

Deep LearningData MiningNeurosciencesAnnotationConditional random fieldCorpusData curationData miningDeep learningNamed entity recognitionText mining

Identifiers

PMID30443819
PMCPMC6594987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.