Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30443780›Full record

ReviewInfection2019

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and antibiotic stewardship: opponents or teammates?

Ester Steffens, Charlotte Quintens, Inge Derdelinckx, Willy E Peetermans, Johan Van Eldere, Isabel Spriet, Annette Schuermans

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Clinical effectiveness of oral antimicrobial therapy for acute pyelonephritis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ester SteffensDepartment of Infection Control and Epidemiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. ester.steffens@uzleuven.be.
Charlotte QuintensDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Inge DerdelinckxDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Willy E PeetermansDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan Van EldereDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Isabel SprietDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Annette SchuermansDepartment of Infection Control and Epidemiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis narrative review aims to describe barriers of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at home (OPAT), potentially compromising general standards of antibiotic stewardship (ABS) and facilitators of OPAT for ABS.

methodsAfter a literature review, five authors determined the barriers and facilitators to discuss in this review.

resultsSixty-six publications were included in the narrative review and seven barriers and five facilitators are discussed in this article. The impracticability of multiple daily dosing during OPAT, the impact of real-life temperature variations, deviations of the infusion rates of elastomeric devices, access to prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy, not administering loading doses before the initiation of extended or continuous infusions and the transmural nature of care associated with OPAT, can lead to deviations of recommended treatment regimens and sub-optimal clinical and laboratory follow-up, with a risk of inferior clinical outcomes, adverse events, drug-resistance and higher costs. On the other hand, OPAT provides access to treatments with intravenous antibiotics and simultaneously avoids prolonged hospitalization.

conclusionImplementing ABS guidelines in OPAT programs, e.g., by using a multidisciplinary team approach and facility-specific protocols for OPAT with patient selection criteria and instructions for selection, storage, preparation and administration of antibiotics, can improve appropriate antibiotic use. Additionally, further research should examine the effectiveness of these interventions on outcomes of OPAT.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipHumansInfusions, ParenteralOutpatientsAnti-Infective AgentsAntibioticsAntimicrobial stewardshipHome careInfectious diseasesOutpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy

Identifiers

PMID30443780
OpenAlexW2901165042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.