Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30443745›Full record

ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2018

[Minimally invasive proximal hamstring insertion repair].

J H Schröder, M Gesslein, M Schütz, C Perka, D R Krüger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic Partial Proximal Hamstring Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J H SchröderCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland. joerg.schroeder@charite.de.
M GessleinKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
M SchützCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
C PerkaCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
D R KrügerCentrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMinimally invasive endoscopic reconstruction of avulsion injuries of the proximal hamstring insertion to prevent persistent weakness and pain. INDICATIONS: Fresh retracted 2‑ and 3‑tendon avulsion injuries of the proximal hamstring insertion. Unsuccessful conservative therapy of less retracted injuries. Painful chronic partial lesions of the proximal hamstring insertion. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Major comorbidities with an increased surgical risk, older patients with low functional demands. Chronic injuries without functional deficits. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Endoscopic refixation using suture anchors after freshening the footprint on the tuber ischiadicum. Visualization of the sciatic nerve to ensure its protection. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial loading with a knee brace for strict prevention of combined knee extension and hip flexion for 4-6 weeks. Start of active exercise and stretching 8 weeks postoperatively.

resultsFrom 2014-2016, 12 patients were treated with an endoscopic reconstruction of the proximal hamstring insertion. After a mean follow-up of 25 months (range 16-34 months), an average visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 (range 0-2) and an average subjective assessment of function (Subjective Hip Value) of 94% (range 80-100%) were found. No neurovascular complications were seen in our collective, in particular no evidence of hypesthesia in the area of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve. All patients were able to return to their original level of activity (Tegner Activity Scale 5.2 preoperatively vs. 5.2 postoperatively), while the average time until return to sport was 6.5 months (range 3-12 months). All patients were able to return to their original occupation.

Indexed as

Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresTendon InjuriesHip InjuriesHumansRange of Motion, ArticularSuture AnchorsThighTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic surgical procedureHamstring tendonsOutcomeReturn to sportTendon injuries

Identifiers

PMID30443745
OpenAlexW2900898710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.