ReviewOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2018
[Minimally invasive proximal hamstring insertion repair].
Review in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Partial Proximal Hamstring Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
- Proximal endoscopic repair of the hamstring tendons: a cadaveric anatomical study of posterior hip portals.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2023Article
- Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used After Proximal Hamstring Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
- Correlation of the Subjective Hip Value with Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements for the Hip.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Proximal Hamstring Tendon Repair for Nonretracted Tears: An Anatomic Approach and Repair Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Approach to Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair.JBJS essential surgical techniquesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMinimally invasive endoscopic reconstruction of avulsion injuries of the proximal hamstring insertion to prevent persistent weakness and pain. INDICATIONS: Fresh retracted 2‑ and 3‑tendon avulsion injuries of the proximal hamstring insertion. Unsuccessful conservative therapy of less retracted injuries. Painful chronic partial lesions of the proximal hamstring insertion. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Major comorbidities with an increased surgical risk, older patients with low functional demands. Chronic injuries without functional deficits. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Endoscopic refixation using suture anchors after freshening the footprint on the tuber ischiadicum. Visualization of the sciatic nerve to ensure its protection. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial loading with a knee brace for strict prevention of combined knee extension and hip flexion for 4-6 weeks. Start of active exercise and stretching 8 weeks postoperatively.
resultsFrom 2014-2016, 12 patients were treated with an endoscopic reconstruction of the proximal hamstring insertion. After a mean follow-up of 25 months (range 16-34 months), an average visual analog scale (VAS) of 0 (range 0-2) and an average subjective assessment of function (Subjective Hip Value) of 94% (range 80-100%) were found. No neurovascular complications were seen in our collective, in particular no evidence of hypesthesia in the area of the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve. All patients were able to return to their original level of activity (Tegner Activity Scale 5.2 preoperatively vs. 5.2 postoperatively), while the average time until return to sport was 6.5 months (range 3-12 months). All patients were able to return to their original occupation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.