ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019
Outcome disparities in colorectal cancer: a SEER-based comparative analysis of racial subgroups.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparities among Black and Hispanic colorectal cancer patients: Findings from the California Cancer Registry.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Racial Disparities in 30-Day Outcomes After Colorectal Surgery in an Integrated Healthcare System.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022Article
- The interplay of pineal hormones and socioeconomic status leading to colorectal cancer disparity.Translational oncology · 2022Review
- Genome-wide association study identifies tumor anatomical site-specific risk variants for colorectal cancer survival.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Failure to administer recommended chemotherapy: acceptable variation or cancer care quality blind spot?BMJ quality & safety · 2020Article
- Bariatric Surgery Trends in the U.S.: 1% is the Loneliest Number.Annals of surgery · 2020Article
- Temporal trends of incidence and mortality in Asian-Americans with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an epidemiological study.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies of ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) have focused mainly on patients of Caucasian and African-American descent. We aimed to evaluate outcomes for a range of races, representing a broader demographic of the US population.
methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried to identify patients with CRC diagnosed between 1994 and 2014. We performed unadjusted Kaplan-Meier test and multivariable covariate-adjusted Cox models to calculate the overall and CRC-specific survival of patients according to their race.
resultsWe identified 401,723 patients diagnosed with CRC between 1994 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) and CRC-specific survival were compared across different races stratified by age, sex, marital status, disease stage and grade, and undergoing surgery as a treatment. Overall, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics had improved CRC-specific survival compared to Whites (HR = 0.873, 95%CI 0.853-0.893, P < .001, and HR = 0.958, 95%CI 0.937-0.979, P < .001, respectively). Blacks had the worst CRC-specific survival outcomes when compared to Whites (HR = 1.215, 95%CI 1.192-1.238, P < .001). Racial disparity persisted when looking at two different time periods (1994-2003 and 2004-2014).
conclusionsAsians/Pacific Islanders have improved outcomes from CRC compared to other races. Multifactorial, including genetic, environmental, and socioeconomic factors appear to influence outcomes and need to be addressed separately in order to reduce racial disparities among patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30443675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.