ArticlePediatric radiology2019
Dual phase infusion with bolus tracking: technical innovation for cardiac and respiratory navigated magnetic resonance angiography using extracellular contrast.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of 3D echocardiography-CT/CMR fusion to create atrioventricular valve-integrated 3D printed heart models in complex congenital heart disease: greater incremental benefit for surgeons than cardiac imagers.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in 3D modeling technologies for congenital heart disease: integrating 3D printing, virtual reality, and holograms.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Practical approach to using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for pre-surgical planning in complex paediatric congenital heart disease.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Urgent and emergent pediatric cardiovascular imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Isotropic, high-resolution, whole-chest inversion recovery contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in under 4.5 min using image-based navigator fluoro trigger.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Inversion recovery and saturation recovery pulmonary vein MR angiography using an image based navigator fluoro trigger and variable-density 3D cartesian sampling with spiral-like order.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Delayed three-dimensional inversion recovery-prepared fast low-angle shot for airway imaging in children: More than myocardial fibrosis assessment.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2024Article
- Assessment of liver fibrosis using a 3-dimensional high-resolution late gadolinium enhancement sequence in children and adolescents with Fontan circulation.European radiology · 2023Article
- Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement using delayed 3D IR-FLASH in the pediatric population: feasibility and diagnostic performance compared to single-shot PSIR-bSSFP.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Contrast-enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography: how we do it.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This technical innovation paper describes a technique for performing cardiac-gated, respiratory-navigated cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography using an extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agent at 1.5 Tesla (T) with a dual phase bolus injection and slow infusion technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.