Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30443232›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Acute Stress Attenuates Cognitive Flexibility in Males Only: An fNIRS Examination.

Vrinda Kalia, Karthik Vishwanath, Katherine Knauft, Bryan Von Der Vellen, Aaron Luebbe, Amber Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Physical Stress Attenuates Cognitive Inhibition: An fNIRS Examination.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Athlete-Specific Neural Strategies under Pressure: A fNIRS Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vrinda KaliaDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Karthik VishwanathDepartment of Physics, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Katherine KnauftDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Bryan Von Der VellenDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Aaron LuebbeDepartment of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Amber WilliamsDepartment of Physics, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.
Miami University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive processes that afford us the ability to control thoughts and achieve goal-directed behavior are known as executive functions. Empirical evidence in the past few years has demonstrated that executive functions can be influenced by acute stress. The impact of acute stress on cognitive flexibility, a key aspect of executive functions, has received little attention in the literature. We present the results of two experiments conducted to examine the effect of acute stress on cognitive flexibility. Acute stress was induced using the cold pressor task. Cognitive flexibility was assessed using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Across both experiments acute stress had an attenuating effect on task switching on the WCST. Our findings also indicate that this effect was moderated by the participant's gender. In Study 1, we observed that following stress exposure male participants in the stress condition made more perseverative errors than participants in the control group. In Study 2, we examined the bilateral hemodynamics in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during acute stress induction using functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Our analysis indicated that functional oxyHb signals fluctuated with greater amplitude than systemic components for participants in the stress group relative to those in the control group. In addition, oxyHb levels post stress induction were correlated with performance on the WCST for the male participants in the stress group only. Concordant with previous reports, our findings indicate that acute stress impacts cognitive flexibility in males and females differentially. Our work also demonstrates the feasibility of using fNIRS as a practical and objective technique for the examination of hemodynamics in the PFC during acute stress.

Indexed as

acute stresscognitive flexibilityfNIRSgender differencesWisconsin Card Sorting Test

Identifiers

PMID30443232
PMCPMC6221931
OpenAlexW2898906356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.