Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442757›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019

Prospective, Multisite, International Comparison of

Louise Emmett, Ur Metser, Glenn Bauman, Rodney J Hicks, Andrew Weickhardt, Ian D Davis, Shonit Punwani, Greg Pond, Sue Chua, Bao Ho and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Diagnostic Role ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Diagnostic Performance ofClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of Digital versus AnalogDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Event-free survival afterEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of Bone Metastases atDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Louise EmmettSt. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia louise.emmett@svha.org.au.
Ur MetserUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Glenn BaumanLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Rodney J HicksPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew WeickhardtOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia and Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ian D DavisMonash University Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Shonit PunwaniUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Greg PondMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sue ChuaRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and.
Bao HoSt. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia louise.emmett@svha.org.au.
Edward JohnstonUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Frederic PouliotCHU de Quebec and Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Andrew M ScottOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia and Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
St Vincent's Hospital Sydney · AUUniversity College London · GBAustin Health · AUEastern Health · AULa Trobe University · AULondon Health Sciences Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16463Cancer Research UK 20265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant proportion of men with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy (RP) fail prostate fossa (PF) salvage radiation treatment (SRT). This study was done to assess the ability of

Indexed as

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingOligopeptidesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyAgedCholineEdetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansInternationalityMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRecurrenceRiskCholineEdetic Acidfluoromethylcholinegallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptides18F-fluoromethylcholinebiochemical recurrencemultiparametric MRIPETprostate cancerPSMA

Identifiers

PMID30442757
PMCPMC6581227
OpenAlexW2900624714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.