ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019
Data-Driven Gross Patient Motion Detection and Compensation: Implications for Coronary
Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Coronary artery disease imaging with total-body PET.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
- From incidental positron emission uptake toFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Coronary sodium [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Observational
- Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- The Role of Positron Emission Tomography in Advancing the Understanding of the Pathogenesis of Heart and Vascular Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- AorticJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Advances in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease Activity with PET/CT and CTA.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Anatomical validation of automatic respiratory motion correction for coronary 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography by expert measurements from four-dimensional computed tomography.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Respiration-averaged CT versus standard CT attenuation map for correction ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Observer repeatability and interscan reproducibility of 18F-sodium fluoride coronary microcalcification activity.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Aortic valve imaging usingEJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Optimizing arterialJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Dynamic cardiac PET motion correction using 3D normalized gradient fields in patients and phantom simulations.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Synergistic motion compensation strategies for positron emission tomography when acquired simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2021Review
- Quantitative thoracic aorta calcification assessment byEuropean radiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Advances in Quantitative Analysis ofMolecular imaging · 2021Review
- Estimation of optimal number of gates in dual gatedScientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patient motion degrades image quality, affecting the quantitative assessment of PET images. This problem affects studies of coronary lesions in which microcalcification processes are targeted. Coronary PET imaging protocols require scans of up to 30 min, introducing the risk of gross patient motion (GPM) during the acquisition. Here, we investigate the feasibility of an automated data-driven method for the detection of GPM during PET acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.