Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442752›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019

Rodney J Hicks, Price Jackson, Grace Kong, Robert E Ware, Michael S Hofman, David A Pattison, Timothy A Akhurst, Elizabeth Drummond, Peter Roselt, Jason Callahan and 10 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Research process of PET tracers for neuroendocrine tumors diagnosis.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Rodney J HicksCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia rod.hicks@petermac.org.
Price JacksonCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Grace KongCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert E WareCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael S HofmanCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David A PattisonCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Timothy A AkhurstCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elizabeth DrummondCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Peter RoseltCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jason CallahanCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Roger PriceMedical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Washington, Australia.
Charmaine M JefferyMedical Technology and Physics, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Washington, Australia.
Emily HongCancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Wayne NoonanLiverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.
Alan HerschtalBiostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lauren J HicksMercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia rod.hicks@petermac.org.
Amos HedtClarity Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia.
Matthew HarrisClarity Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia.
Brett M PatersonSchool of Chemistry, Monash University, Victoria, Australia; and.
Paul S DonnellySchool of Chemistry and Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging of somatostatin receptor expression is an established technique for staging of neuroendocrine neoplasia and determining the suitability of patients for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. PET/CT using

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAgedBiological TransportFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsOctreotideProspective StudiesRadiometryRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, PeptideSafety64Cu-SARTATEOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Peptidecopper-64neuroendocrine tumorpeptide receptor radionuclide therapypositron emission tomographyradiopharmaceuticalstheranostics

Identifiers

PMID30442752
PMCPMC6581229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.