ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2019
Persistently low inferior vena cava filter retrieval rates in a population-based cohort.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Managing an effective system for retrieving IVC filters: outcomes of a prospective patient database, 2012-2023.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Clinical Correlates of In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Undergoing Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement for Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictors of endobronchial forceps utilization for inferior vena cava filter retrieval: when snare retrieval fails.CVIR endovascular · 2023Article
- A review of inferior vena cava filters.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Does timing of IVC filter placement in bariatric surgery patients impact perioperative outcomes?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- Safety and efficacy of inferior vena cava filter retrieval: a 5-year single center retrospective review from a tertiary care center.CVIR endovascular · 2022Article
- Review article inferior vena cava thrombosis: a case series of patients observed in Taiwan and literature review.Thrombosis journal · 2021Review
- Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Trends: A Single-Center Experience.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
- Randomized Controlled Study of an Absorbable Vena Cava Filter in a Porcine Model.Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 2019Article
- The role of an IVC filter retrieval clinic-A single center retrospective analysis.The Indian journal of radiology & imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPractice patterns associated with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement have seen considerable variation in the last decade. We used a statewide administrative database to examine trends in IVC filter placement and retrieval in the general population.
methodsWe reviewed Florida state inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases from 2004 to 2014. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis and procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were searched for patients undergoing inpatient or outpatient IVC filter placement, and each patient was longitudinally tracked to the time of inpatient or outpatient filter retrieval. For inpatient filter placements, associated diagnoses were reviewed to identify indications for placement. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with improved retrieval rates.
resultsDuring the 11-year period, 131,791 IVC filter placements were identified, with a 50% increase from 2004 to 2010 and a 24% decline from 2010 to 2014. Median age at filter placement was 71 years (interquartile range, 57-81 years). Mean follow-up after filter placement was 17.3 ± 25.5 months. Only 8637 filters (6.6%) were retrieved. The annual retrieval rate trended upward, from 3.4% in 2004 to 8.5% in 2013 (P < .001). Median filter dwell time was 96.5 days (interquartile range, 44-178 days). Diagnoses associated with filter placement included venous thromboembolism (75.9%), trauma (35.0%), hemorrhage (29.9%), malignant disease (29.4%), and stroke (5.1%). Retrieval rates were highest in younger patients (34.0% in patients younger than 20 years) and lowest in Medicare patients (2.5%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, Medicare was associated with decreased retrieval rates (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.35; P < .001) after adjusting for age and associated diagnoses. Weaker risk factors included increased age, white race, and diagnoses of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and malignant disease. A trauma diagnosis was associated with improved retrieval. To further investigate the Medicare effect, a propensity score-matched model was created to better account for confounding effects. In this model, Medicare persisted as a risk factor for decreased filter retrieval (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.46; P < .001).
conclusionsIVC filter placements, after a substantial increase between 2004 and 2010, have been declining since 2010. Retrieval rates in the general population are steadily improving but continue to lag behind those described in center-specific literature. Increased age and Medicare as the primary payer are the strongest risk factors for lack of filter retrieval. Widespread improvements on a national scale are needed to improve the appropriateness of filter placements and to enhance filter retrieval rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.