Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442479›Full record

ArticleVaccine2019

Oral polio vaccine response in the MAL-ED birth cohort study: Considerations for polio eradication strategies.

William K Pan, Jessica C Seidman, Asad Ali, Christel Hoest, Carl Mason, Dinesh Mondal, Stacey L Knobler, Pascal Bessong, MAL-ED Network Investigators

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Vaccine and malnutrition: A narrative review.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Intestinal Colonization WithFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

William K PanDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Trent Hall, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: william.pan@duke.edu.
Jessica C SeidmanFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Asad AliAga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Christel HoestFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carl MasonArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dinesh MondalICDDR, B, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Stacey L KnoblerFogarty International Center/National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pascal BessongUniversity of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa.
MAL-ED Network Investigators
National Institutes of Health · USAga Khan University · PKArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THDuke University · USInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDUniversity of Venda · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunization programs have leveraged decades of research to maximize oral polio vaccine (OPV) response. Moving toward global poliovirus eradication, the WHO recommended phased OPV-to-IPV replacement on schedules in 2012. Using the MAL-ED prospective birth cohort data, we evaluated the influence of early life exposures impacting OPV immunization by measuring OPV response for serotypes 1 and 3.

methodsPolio neutralizing antibody assays were conducted at 7 and 15 months of age for serotypes 1 and 3. Analyses were conducted on children receiving ≥3 OPV doses (n = 1449). History of vaccination, feeding patterns, physical growth, home environment, diarrhea, enteropathogen detection, and gut inflammation were examined as risk factors for non-response [Log

findingsSerotype 1 seroconversion was significantly higher than serotype 3 (96.6% vs. 89.6%, 15 months). Model results indicate serotypes 1 and 3 failure was minimized following four and six OPV doses, respectively; however, enteropathogen detection and poor socioeconomic conditions attenuated response in both serotypes. At three months of age, bacterial detection in stool reduced serotype 1 and 3 Log

interpretationUnder real-world conditions, improved vaccination coverage and socio-environmental conditions, and reducing early life bacterial exposures are key to improving OPV response and should inform polio eradication strategies.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsAntibodies, NeutralizingCohort StudiesDisease EradicationFecesFemaleGlobal HealthHumansImmunization ScheduleInfantMaleNeutralization TestsPoliomyelitisPoliovirusPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralAntibodies, NeutralizingPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralEnteropathogen infectionHome environmentOral polio vaccinationPoliomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID30442479
PMCPMC6325791
OpenAlexW2900818302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.