ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2019
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2025Review
- Socioeconomic Disparities and In-Hospital Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case-Control Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Association between social determinants of health and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and sex differences in US adults: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2025Article
- Retrospective Evaluation and Analysis of Pharmacoequity with Guideline-directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (REAP-HF).Innovations in pharmacy · 2025Article
- Socioeconomic status and equity among patients with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Social Vulnerability Index and All-Cause Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke, Medicare Cohort 2020-2023.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- A census tract-level assessment of social determinants of health, traffic exposure, and asthma exacerbations in New York State's Medicaid Population (2005-2015).Eco-Environment & Health · 2024Article
- Presentation, management, and early outcomes of young acute coronary syndrome patients- analysis of 23,560 South Asian patients from 2012 to 2021.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Risk Associated With Social Determinants of Health at Individual and Area Levels.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- An analysis of the correlation between REM-related mild obstructive sleep apnea and common cardiometabolic diseases.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2024Article
- 2024 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- The Water Surrounding the Iceberg: Cultural Racism and Health Inequities.The Milbank quarterly · 2023Article
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2023Review
- Income disparity and utilization of cardiovascular preventive care services among U.S. adults.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2021Article
- Brain-heart connections in stress and cardiovascular disease: Implications for the cardiac patient.Atherosclerosis · 2021Review
- Psychological stress in heart failure: a potentially actionable disease modifier.Heart failure reviews · 2021Review
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2021Article
- Area-based socioeconomic status and mortality: the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2020Article
- Low socioeconomic status and depression: A double jeopardy for cardiovascular disease?Journal of psychosomatic research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population; however, its effect on high-risk patients with prevalent coronary artery disease (CAD) is unclear. We hypothesized "double jeopardy," whereby the association between nSES and adverse outcomes would be greater in high-risk patients with heart failure (HF) and/or previous myocardial infarction (MI) compared with those without. We followed 3,635 patients (mean age 63.2 years, 42% with HF, 25% with previous MI) with known or suspected CAD over a median of 3.3 years for all-cause death and cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI. Patients were categorized by a composite nSES score, and proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between nSES and outcomes. Cross-product interaction terms for previous MI × nSES and HF × nSES were analyzed. Compared with high nSES patients, low nSES patients had increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20, 2.15) and cardiovascular death or MI (subdistribution HR [sHR] = 1.82; 95% CI = 1.30, 2.54). Associations were more pronounced among patients without HF or previous MI. Low nSES patients without HF had a higher risk of all-cause death (HR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.41, 3.65) compared with those with HF (HR = 1.21; 95% CI = 0.82, 1.77, P interaction = 0.04). Similarly, low nSES patients without previous MI had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or MI (sHR = 2.72; 95% CI = 1.73, 4.28) compared with those with previous MI (sHR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.58, 1.81, P interaction = 0.02). In conclusion, low nSES was independently associated with all-cause death and cardiovascular death or MI in patients with CAD; however, associations were greater in patients without HF or previous MI compared with those with HF or MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.