Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442202›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2018

Diffusion-weighted imaging of rectal cancer on repeatability and cancer characterization: an effect of b-value distribution study.

Luguang Chen, Fu Shen, Zhihui Li, Haidi Lu, Yukun Chen, Zhen Wang, Jianping Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The performance of DWI and ADC values with different b-values for the diagnosis and staging of endometrial carcinoma at 3T.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for rectal Cancer detection and characterization.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luguang ChenDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Fu ShenDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhihui LiDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Haidi LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yukun ChenDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Zhen WangDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Jianping LuDepartment of Radiology, Changhai Hospital of Shanghai, The Second Military Medical University, No.168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. cjr.lujianping@vip.163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-7470

Funding

the national key clinical specialist construction programs of China N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the effect of b-value distributions on the repeatability and diagnostic performance of the ADC value in rectal cancer patients using multiple b-values and mono-exponential model diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI).

methodsThirty-two preoperative rectal cancer patients, without receiving neoadjuvant therapy, were scanned on a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner using DWI with 10 b-values ranging from 0 to 2000 s/mm

resultsPostoperative pathology tests revealed 4 patients with T1, 10 patients with T2, and 18 patients with T3 stages. There were no significant difference in age and sex between the two groups (T1-2 vs. T3). Excellent reproducibility was observed for ADC values between two observers with ICC and CV values ranging from 0.920 to 0.998, and 1.475 to 5.568%, respectively. The mean percent difference and ρ between the paired measurements was ranged from - 2.7 to 1.2% and from - 0.759 to - 0.407, respectively. The b-value combinations with the top three α values were b(0, 1000 s/mm

conclusionsThe number of b-values and their distributions influenced the repeatability of the ADC values and their diagnostic performance. The optimal b-value combination was 0 and 1000 s/mm

Indexed as

AdultAgedData Interpretation, StatisticalDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsApparent diffusion coefficientB-valueDiffusion-weighted imagingRectal cancerT stage

Identifiers

PMID30442202
PMCPMC6238345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.