Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442161›Full record

ReviewItalian journal of pediatrics2018

Biochemical and molecular analysis in mucopolysaccharidoses: what a paediatrician must know.

Mirella Filocamo, Rosella Tomanin, Francesca Bertola, Amelia Morrone

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in Therapies for Mucopolysaccharidoses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Identification of Surrogate Biomarkers for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type IVA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Targeting Neurological Aspects of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Beyond.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Misdiagnosis in mucopolysaccharidoses.Journal of applied genetics · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mucopolysaccharidosis Type VI, an Updated Overview of the Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mirella FilocamoLaboratorio di Genetica Molecolare e Biobanche, Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy. mirellafilocamo@gaslini.org.
Rosella TomaninLaboratory of Diagnosis and Therapy of Lysosomal Disorders, Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Francesca BertolaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Amelia MorroneNeuroscience Department, Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory of Neurometabolic Diseases, Meyer Children's Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare inherited disorders caused by a deficit of the lysosomal hydrolases involved in the degradation of mucopolysaccharides, also known as glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). They are all monogenic defects, transmitted in an autosomal recessive way, except for MPS type II which is X-linked. The enzymatic deficit causes a pathologic accumulation of undegraded or partially degraded substrates inside lysosomes as well as in the extracellular compartment. MPS generally present with recognizable signs and symptoms to raise a clinical suspicion. However, although they have individual peculiarities, often signs and symptoms may overlap between different MPS types. Therefore, a deeper evaluation of specific disease biomarkers becomes necessary to reach an appropriate diagnosis. This paper stresses the central role of the laboratory in completing and confirming the clinical suspicion of MPS according to a standardized procedure: first, a biochemical evaluation of the patient samples, including qualitative/quantitative urinary GAG analysis and a determination of enzyme activities, and then the molecular diagnosis. We also encourage a constant and close communication between clinicians and laboratory personnel to address a correct and early MPS diagnosis.

Indexed as

ChildGlycosaminoglycansHumansHydrolasesMucopolysaccharidosesGlycosaminoglycansHydrolasesGenetic counsellingGenotype-phenotype relationshipGlycosaminoglycansLaboratory testsLysosomal storage disordersMolecular analysisMucopolysaccharidesPseudodeficiency

Identifiers

PMID30442161
PMCPMC6238298
OpenAlexW2901505034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.