ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018
Machine learning algorithms for activity recognition in ambulant children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Inertial Measurement Units in Medicine: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review on the application of wearable inertial sensors to quantify everyday life motor activity in people with mobility impairments.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- Instrumented assessment of motor function in dyskinetic cerebral palsy: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Pooled it
- Body position classification using wearable sensors in infants with cerebral palsy.Infant behavior & development · 2026Article
- Use of artificial intelligence for outcome assessment in pediatric rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Article
- Wearable sensors in paediatric neurology.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Monitoring of child-specific activities in ambulatory children with and without developmental disabilities.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Emerging methods for measuring physical activity using accelerometry in children and adolescents with neuromotor disorders: a narrative review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Review
- Time-Series Modeling and Forecasting of Cerebral Pressure-Flow Physiology: A Scoping Systematic Review of the Human and Animal Literature.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches in cerebral palsy diagnosis, prognosis, and management: a comprehensive review.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Review
- Validation of two novel human activity recognition models for typically developing children and children with Cerebral Palsy.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- A Machine Learning Pipeline for Gait Analysis in a Semi Free-Living Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Improving Inertial Sensor-Based Activity Recognition in Neurological Populations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predictors Using Machine Learning of Complete Peroneal Nerve Palsy Recovery After Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Machine learning-based ABA treatment recommendation and personalization for autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study.Brain informatics · 2022Article
- IMU-Based Monitoring for Assistive Diagnosis and Management of IoHT: A Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Human activity recognition of children with wearable devices using LightGBM machine learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebral palsy (CP) is the most common physical disability among children (2.5 to 3.6 cases per 1000 live births). Inadequate physical activity (PA) is a major problem effecting the health and well-being of children with CP. Practical, yet accurate measures of PA are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical and therapy-based interventions to increase PA. Accelerometer-based motion sensors have become the standard for objectively measuring PA in children and adolescents; however, current methods for estimating physical activity intensity in children with CP are associated with significant error and may dramatically underestimate HPA in children with more severe mobility limitations. Machine learning (ML) models that first classify the PA type and then predict PA intensity or energy expenditure using activity specific regression equations may be more accurate than standalone regression models. However, the feasibility and validity of ML methods has not been explored in youth with CP. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and test ML models for the automatic identification of PA type in ambulant children with CP.
methodsTwenty two children and adolescents (mean age: 12.8 ± 2.9 y) with CP classified at GMFCS Levels I to III completed 7 activity trials while wearing an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer on the hip and wrist. Trials were categorised as sedentary (SED), standing utilitarian movements (SUM), comfortable walking (CW), and brisk walking (BW). Random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and binary decision tree (BDT) classifiers were trained with features extracted from the vector magnitude (VM) of the raw acceleration signal using 10 s non-overlapping windows. Performance was evaluated using leave-one-subject out cross validation.
resultsSVM (82.0-89.0%) and RF (82.6-88.8%) provided significantly better classification accuracy than BDT (76.1-86.2%). Hip (82.7-85.5%) and wrist (76.1-82.6%) classifiers exhibited comparable prediction accuracy, while the combined hip and wrist (86.2-89.0%) classifiers achieved the best overall performance. For all classifiers, recognition accuracy was excellent for SED (94.1-97.9%), good to excellent for SUM (74.0-96.6%) and brisk walking (71.5-86.0%), and modest for comfortable walking (47.6-70.4%). When comfortable and brisk walking were combined into a single walking class, recognition accuracy ranged from 90.3 to 96.5%.
conclusionsML methods provided acceptable classification accuracy for detection of a range of activities commonly performed by ambulatory children with CP. The resultant models can help clinicians more effectively monitor bouts of brisk walking in the community. The results indicate that 2-step models that first classify PA type and then predict energy expenditure using activity specific regression equations are worthy of exploration in this patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.