SynthesisBMC medical education2018
Peer teacher training for health professional students: a systematic review of formal programs.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- Video-based, student tutor- versus faculty staff-led ultrasound course for medical students - a prospective randomized study.BMC medical education · 2020Trial
- Point-of-care ultrasound training using near-peer training and remote Supervision: A pilot randomized controlled trial.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
- Enhancing musculoskeletal examination skills through near-peer teaching: student outcomes and perspectives.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The value of a peer-to-peer teaching community in medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Peer facilitators in interprofessional education: a promising response to facilitation challenges.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- What psychosocial factors shape HIV testing willingness among Chinese college students? A cross-sectional survey integrating PLS-SEM and fsQCA.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- From passive to participatory: exploring pharmacy students' experiences and perceptions with active learning.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Balancing act-ethnic minority trainees' coping strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training-a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Article
- Building the 8-star doctor: a modified Delphi study to define, teach, and assess health professions education for undergraduate medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Learning to teach by teaching your peers: exploring students' needs for training in the undergraduate medical education curriculum.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Peer-Assisted Learning in health professional education: a scoping review of systematic reviews.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- "Between formulas and freestyle" - a qualitative analysis of peer tutor preparation and its impact on peer relations.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a collaborative multi-disciplinary train-the-trainer program for first responders in chemical, radiologic and nuclear emergencies - a pre- and post-test.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Students-as-Teachers Program: Developing and Empowering Future Medical Educators.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Development and Implementation of a Peer-Teaching Curriculum for Student Assistants.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Medical Students as Teachers: A Student-Led Course in Developing Teaching Skills.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Preparing medical students for their educational task as physicians: important, desirable and unexplored territory.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- A Near-Peer Interprofessional Educational Fellowship Program for Training Pre-Clinical Medical Students in the Best Practices of Teaching and Learning.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Granting access: Development of a formal course to demystify and promote predoctoral fellowship applications for graduate students.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkills in peer teaching, assessment and feedback are documented internationally as required graduate attributes for health professional students, placing emphasis on universities to prepare health professional graduates with teaching skills. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the rational, design, content and evaluation of student peer teacher training skills programs across the health professions.
methodsIn October 2017, a search was conducted of five databases (Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, ERIC and Cochrane Collection) using combinations of key search terms: 'Student as teacher', 'near-peer teaching', 'student teacher', 'peer teacher', 'peer-to-peer', 'undergraduate', 'medical education', 'curriculum', 'program', 'training', 'allied health', 'health science', 'pharmacy', 'nurse', and 'medicine', with results restricted to articles published in English within the decade. Articles were excluded if they were not original research, focused on a teaching approach other than peer assisted learning or teaching, did not adequately describe a student teacher training component of at least 3 hrs duration, or addressed only clinical skills training and not teaching skills training.
resultsThe two authors independently assessed 42 full-text articles for eligibility, with 19 articles satisfying criteria for inclusion. Dominating results were uni-disciplinary, faculty-led, non-mandated programs, targeting participants in senior years of training. Medicine was the dominant profession, with an obvious underrepresentation of the other health professions. Common program content included the foundations of education theory, teaching methods and techniques, and providing feedback. Summary and comparison of program design is restricted by gaps and inconsistencies in reporting, while the evaluation of programs remains largely subjective.
conclusionsTeaching is increasingly recognised as a core professional skill across the health workforce, with expectations to teach peers and colleagues, within and across professional disciplines, as well as to educate patients. Students, faculty and institutes may benefit from training programs being designed for implementation in any health profession; and further to this, implemented within an interprofessionally context. Consistent reporting of teacher training programs, and objective methods of evaluation would enable more in-depth investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.