Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442132›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Fear and rumours regarding placental biopsies in a malaria-in-pregnancy trial in Benin.

Adélaïde Compaoré, Susan Dierickx, Fatou Jaiteh, Alain Nahum, Towanou Francis Emmanuel Bohissou, Halidou Tinto, Susana Scott, Umberto D'Alessandro, Henk Schallig, Koen Peeters Grietens

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Adélaïde CompaoréClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso. adelhaid.compaore@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4798-0619
Susan DierickxMedical Anthropology Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Fatou JaitehMedical Anthropology Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alain NahumCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin.
Towanou Francis Emmanuel BohissouCentre de Recherches Entomologiques de Cotonou, Cotonou, Benin.
Halidou TintoClinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Nanoro, Burkina Faso.
Susana ScottMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London, School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Fajara, The Gambia.
Umberto D'AlessandroMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at London, School of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Fajara, The Gambia.
Henk SchalligDepartment of Medical Microbiology-Parasitology Unit, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, 1105, AZ, The Netherlands.
Koen Peeters GrietensMedical Anthropology Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFMRC Unit the Gambia · GMAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNagasaki University · JPVrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

European community's Seventh Framework Programme 305662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA multi-country, community-based trial on scheduled screening and treatment for malaria in pregnancy was conducted in Benin, The Gambia and Burkina Faso. Despite standardized procedures and outcomes, the study became subject to rumours and accusations of placenta being sold for mystical and financial gain by trial staff, leading to drop-out rates of 30% and the consequent halting of placental biopsy sampling in Benin. This paper explores the role of socio-cultural beliefs related to placenta and identified additional factors contributing these rumours.

methodsA qualitative comparative emergent-theory design was used to assess social factors related to trial implementation and uptake in the three countries. Data from participant observation, informal conversations, group discussions and interviews were triangulated and analysed with NVivo Qualitative Analysis software.

resultsDespite similar sociocultural beliefs about the sacred nature of the placenta in all three study countries, these beliefs did not affect participation rates in Burkina Faso and The Gambia and placenta-related rumours only emerged in Benin. Therefore, the presence of beliefs is not a sufficient condition to have generated placenta-selling fears. The rumours in Benin reflected the confluence of placenta-related beliefs and factors related to the implementation of the trial (including a catalysing adverse event and miscommunication during the informed consent procedure). Furthermore, distinct socio-political factors contributed to the emergence of rumours, including the historical distrust in governmental organizations and the tense relationship between some of the actors involved in the trial.

conclusionTransdisciplinary social science research designs should accompany the implementation of the trial. The integration of multiple stakeholders' knowledge and involvement is required to define and solve upcoming barriers.

Indexed as

FearPlacentaBeninBiopsyFemaleHumansInformed ConsentMalariaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticClinical trialCommunity health workerMalariaPlacentaPregnancyRumour

Identifiers

PMID30442132
PMCPMC6238265
OpenAlexW2900557858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.