Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442131›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2018

Safety of Safety Evaluation of Pesticides: developmental neurotoxicity of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl.

Axel Mie, Christina Rudén, Philippe Grandjean

Open access · goldAbstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chlorpyrifos and Chlorpyrifos-Oxon: A Widening Spectrum of Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Glyphosate exposure and GM seed rollout unequally reduced perinatal health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chlorpyrifos Occurrence and Toxicological Risk Assessment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  9. What you don't know can still hurt you - underreporting in EU pesticide regulation.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Axel MieKarolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, 11883, Stockholm, Sweden. axel.mie@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-8053-3541
Christina RudénDepartment of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Philippe GrandjeanUniversity of Southern Denmark, Department of Public Health, Odense, Denmark.
Harvard University · USKarolinska Institutet · SEStatistics Sweden · SE

Funding

Sources, Transport, Exposure & Effects of PFAS (STEEP) Center - RENEWALP42ES027706 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI Harrison Dekker · 2017 to 2026
$18.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS ES027706NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES027706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Authorization of pesticides for market release requires toxicity testing on animals, typically performed by test laboratories on contract with the pesticide producer. The latter provides the results and summary to the regulatory authorities. For the commonly used pesticide chlorpyrifos, an industry-funded toxicity study concludes that no selective effects on neurodevelopment occur even at high exposures. In contrast, the evidence from independent studies points to adverse effects of current exposures on cognitive development in children. We reviewed the industry-funded developmental neurotoxicity test data on chlorpyrifos and the related substance chlorpyrifos-methyl. We noted treatment-related changes in a brain dimension measure for chlorpyrifos at all dose levels tested, although not been reported in the original test summary. We further found issues which inappropriately decrease the ability of the studies to reveal true effects, including a dosage regimen that resulted in too low exposure of the nursing pups for chlorpyrifos and possibly for chlorpyrifos-methyl, and a failure to detect any neurobehavioral effects of lead nitrate used as positive control in the chlorpyrifos study. Our observations thus suggest that conclusions in test reports submitted by the producer may be misleading. This discrepancy affects the ability of regulatory authorities to perform a valid and safe evaluation of these pesticides. The difference between raw data and conclusions in the test reports indicates a potential existence of bias that would require regulatory attention and possible resolution.

Indexed as

ChlorpyrifosPesticidesAnimalsAttentionBrainChildHumansRatsChlorpyrifoschlorpyrifos-methylPesticidesBiasDevelopmental neurotoxicityPesticidesToxicity testing

Identifiers

PMID30442131
PMCPMC6238321
OpenAlexW2901490353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.