Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442096›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2018

Creative adapting in a fluid environment: an explanatory model of paramedic decision making in the pre-hospital setting.

Gudrun Reay, James A Rankin, Lorraine Smith-MacDonald, Gerald C Lazarenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Workplace violence from the ambulance personnel's perspective, a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human errors in emergency medical services: a qualitative analysis of contributing factors.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Acil servis tanıları ile paramediklerin ilk değerlendirme tanılarının karşılaştırılması.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gudrun ReayFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada. gudrun.reay2@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4866-4132
James A RankinFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Lorraine Smith-MacDonaldFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Gerald C LazarenkoAlberta Health Services, Seventh Street Plaza, 14th Floor, North Tower, 10030 - 107 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3E4, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParamedics work in a highly complex and unpredictable environment which is characterized by ongoing decision-making. Decisions made by paramedics in the prehospital setting have implications for patient safety, transport, treatment, and health resource utilization. The objective of this study was; a) to understand how paramedics conduct decision-making in the field, and b) to develop a grounded theory of paramedic decision-making in the prehospital setting.

methodThis study was conducted using classical grounded theory. Paramedics (n = 13) with five or more years' experience, who worked in a large urban center in Western Canada were interviewed. Field observations were conducted, each lasting 12 h, with five different ambulance crews. The data were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method.

resultsThe resultant theory, Creative Adapting in a Fluid Environment, indicates paramedic decision-making is a fluid iterative process. Unpredictable and dynamic features of the prehospital environment require paramedics to use a flexible and creative approach to decision-making. The model consists of the three categories constructing a malleable model, revising the model, and situation-specific action. Two additional components, safety and extrication, are considered at each stage of the call. These two components in conjunction with the three categories influence how decisions are made and enacted.

conclusionParamedic decision-making is highly contextual and requires accurate interpretation and flexible cognitive constructs that are rapidly adaptable. Evaluation of paramedic decision-making needs to account for the complex and dynamic interaction between the environment, patient characteristics, available resources, and provider experience and knowledge.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorEmergency Medical ServicesCanadaEmergency Medical TechniciansFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient SafetyQualitative ResearchDecision-makingEmergency Medical ServicesGrounded theoryParamedic judgementParamedicsPre-hospital care

Identifiers

PMID30442096
PMCPMC6238402
OpenAlexW2901472171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.