Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442095›Full record

Trial reportBMC infectious diseases2018

Less renal allograft fibrosis with valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus compared to high-dose valacyclovir: a parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Tomas Reischig, Martin Kacer, Petra Hruba, Hana Hermanova, Ondrej Hes, Daniel Lysak, Stanislav Kormunda, Mirko Bouda

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomas ReischigDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic and Teaching Hospital, 30460, Pilsen, Czech Republic. reischig@fnplzen.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-598X
Martin KacerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic and Teaching Hospital, 30460, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Petra HrubaBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 32300, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Hana HermanovaDepartment of Hemato-oncology, Teaching Hospital, 30460, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Ondrej HesBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 32300, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Daniel LysakBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 32300, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Stanislav KormundaBiomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 32300, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Mirko BoudaDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic and Teaching Hospital, 30460, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZ

Funding

Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Progres Q39Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic MZO 00023001Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic National Sustainability Program I [LO1503]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis may prevent CMV indirect effects in renal transplant recipients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of valganciclovir and valacyclovir prophylaxis for CMV after renal transplantation with the focus on chronic histologic damage within the graft.

methodsFrom November 2007 through April 2012, adult renal transplant recipients were randomized, in an open-label, single-center study, at a 1:1 ratio to 3-month prophylaxis with valganciclovir (n = 60) or valacyclovir (n = 59). The primary endpoint was moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy assessed by protocol biopsy at 3 years evaluated by a single pathologist blinded to the study group. The analysis was conducted in an intention-to-treat population.

resultsAmong the 101 patients who had a protocol biopsy specimen available, the risk of moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy was significantly lower in those treated with valganciclovir (22% versus 34%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.90; P = 0.032 by multivariate logistic regression). The incidence of CMV disease (9% versus 2%; P = 0.115) and CMV DNAemia (36% versus 42%; P = 0.361) were not different at 3 years.

conclusionsValganciclovir prophylaxis, as compared with valacyclovir, was associated with a reduced risk of moderate-to-severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in patients after renal transplantation.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12610000016033 ). Registered on September 26, 2007.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationAdultAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntiviral AgentsAustraliaCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFibrosisGraft SurvivalHumansIncidenceIntention to Treat AnalysisKidneyKidney DiseasesAntiviral AgentsValacyclovirValganciclovirCytomegalovirusFibrosisProphylaxisRenal transplantationValganciclovir

Identifiers

PMID30442095
PMCPMC6238264
OpenAlexW2900910856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.