ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Learning protein binding affinity using privileged information.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Models and Impact of Interfacial Contacts and Amino Acids on Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Article
- Attentive Variational Information Bottleneck for TCR-peptide interaction prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- PPI-Affinity: A Web Tool for the Prediction and Optimization of Protein-Peptide and Protein-Protein Binding Affinity.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Implications of disease-related mutations at protein-protein interfaces.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinities from Unbound Protein Structures.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Protein-Protein Interactions: Insight from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Structural Aspects and Prediction of Calmodulin-Binding Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- ISLAND: in-silico proteins binding affinity prediction using sequence information.BioData mining · 2020Article
- Machine learning classification can reduce false positives in structure-based virtual screening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDetermining protein-protein interactions and their binding affinity are important in understanding cellular biological processes, discovery and design of novel therapeutics, protein engineering, and mutagenesis studies. Due to the time and effort required in wet lab experiments, computational prediction of binding affinity from sequence or structure is an important area of research. Structure-based methods, though more accurate than sequence-based techniques, are limited in their applicability due to limited availability of protein structure data.
resultsIn this study, we propose a novel machine learning method for predicting binding affinity that uses protein 3D structure as privileged information at training time while expecting only protein sequence information during testing. Using the method, which is based on the framework of learning using privileged information (LUPI), we have achieved improved performance over corresponding sequence-based binding affinity prediction methods that do not have access to privileged information during training. Our experiments show that with the proposed framework which uses structure only during training, it is possible to achieve classification performance comparable to that which is obtained using structure-based features. Evaluation on an independent test set shows improved performance over the PPA-Pred2 method as well.
conclusionsThe proposed method outperforms several baseline learners and a state-of-the-art binding affinity predictor not only in cross-validation, but also on an additional validation dataset, demonstrating the utility of the LUPI framework for problems that would benefit from classification using structure-based features. The implementation of LUPI developed for this work is expected to be useful in other areas of bioinformatics as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.