Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30442086›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Learning protein binding affinity using privileged information.

Wajid Arshad Abbasi, Amina Asif, Asa Ben-Hur, Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Deep Learning for Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Structural Aspects and Prediction of Calmodulin-Binding Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Machine learning classification can reduce false positives in structure-based virtual screening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wajid Arshad AbbasiBiomedical Informatics Research Laboratory (BIRL), Department of Computer and Information Sciences (DCIS), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, ISL, 45650, Pakistan.
Amina AsifBiomedical Informatics Research Laboratory (BIRL), Department of Computer and Information Sciences (DCIS), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, ISL, 45650, Pakistan.
Asa Ben-HurDepartment of Computer Science, Colorado State University (CSU), Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. asa@cs.colostate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8269-6942
Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar MinhasBiomedical Informatics Research Laboratory (BIRL), Department of Computer and Information Sciences (DCIS), Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS), Nilore, ISL, 45650, Pakistan. fayyazafsar@gmail.com.

Funding

Directorate for Biological Sciences 1564840National Research Program for Universities (NRPU), HEC, Pakistan 6085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining protein-protein interactions and their binding affinity are important in understanding cellular biological processes, discovery and design of novel therapeutics, protein engineering, and mutagenesis studies. Due to the time and effort required in wet lab experiments, computational prediction of binding affinity from sequence or structure is an important area of research. Structure-based methods, though more accurate than sequence-based techniques, are limited in their applicability due to limited availability of protein structure data.

resultsIn this study, we propose a novel machine learning method for predicting binding affinity that uses protein 3D structure as privileged information at training time while expecting only protein sequence information during testing. Using the method, which is based on the framework of learning using privileged information (LUPI), we have achieved improved performance over corresponding sequence-based binding affinity prediction methods that do not have access to privileged information during training. Our experiments show that with the proposed framework which uses structure only during training, it is possible to achieve classification performance comparable to that which is obtained using structure-based features. Evaluation on an independent test set shows improved performance over the PPA-Pred2 method as well.

conclusionsThe proposed method outperforms several baseline learners and a state-of-the-art binding affinity predictor not only in cross-validation, but also on an additional validation dataset, demonstrating the utility of the LUPI framework for problems that would benefit from classification using structure-based features. The implementation of LUPI developed for this work is expected to be useful in other areas of bioinformatics as well.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyLigandsProtein BindingProteinsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSupport Vector MachineLigandsProteinsMachine learningPrivileged informationProtein binding affinity predictionProtein-protein interactions

Identifiers

PMID30442086
PMCPMC6238365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.