Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30441824›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2018

Accuracy of Commonly-Used Imaging Modalities in Assessing Left Atrial Appendage for Interventional Closure: Review Article.

Ramez Morcos, Haider Al Taii, Priya Bansal, Joel Casale, Rupesh Manam, Vikram Patel, Anthony Cioci, Michael Kucharik, Arjun Malhotra, Brijeshwar Maini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with cancer.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Advanced 3D Visualization and 3D Printing in Radiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ramez MorcosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. morcos.ramez@gmail.com.
Haider Al TaiiDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. haltaii@health.fau.edu.
Priya BansalDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. Pbansal@health.fau.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1405-6374
Joel CasaleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. jcasale3@health.fau.edu.
Rupesh ManamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. rmanam@health.fau.edu.
Vikram PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. patelv@health.fau.edu.
Anthony CiociCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. acioci@health.fau.edu.
Michael KucharikCollege of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. mkucharik2016@health.fau.edu.
Arjun MalhotraUniversity of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA. a.malhotra2@umiami.edu.
Brijeshwar MainiTenet Florida & Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. brijmaini1@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprocedural imaging assessment for percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) transcatheter occlusion can be obtained by utilizing different imaging modalities including fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound imaging. Given the complex and variable morphology of the left atrial appendage, it is crucial to obtain the most accurate LAA dimensions to prevent intra-procedural device changes, recapture maneuvers, and prolonged procedure time. We therefore sought to examine the accuracy of the most commonly utilized imaging modalities in LAA occlusion. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was waived as we only reviewed published data. By utilizing PUBMED which is an integrated online website to list the published literature based on its relevance, we retrieved thirty-two articles on the accuracy of most commonly used imaging modalities for pre-procedural assessment of the left atrial appendage morphology, namely, two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and three-dimensional printing. There is strong evidence that real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is more accurate than two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Three-dimensional computed tomography has recently emerged as an imaging modality and it showed exceptional accuracy when merged with three-dimensional printing technology. However, real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography may be considered the preferred imaging modality as it can provide accurate measurements without requiring radiation exposure or contrast administration. We will present the most common imaging modality used for LAA assessment and will provide an algorithmic approach including preprocedural, periprocedural, intraprocedural, and postprocedural.

Indexed as

2D transesophageal echocardiography3D transesophageal echocardiographycomputerized tomographyleft atrial appendageWATCHMAN occlusive device

Identifiers

PMID30441824
PMCPMC6262547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.