ArticlePloS one2018
Changes in chemical and ultrastructural composition of ameroid constrictors following in vitro expansion.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical treatment of concomitant congenital left gastro-azygos and extrahepatic umbilico-caval portosystemic shunts in a dog.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025Article
- Crafting a Rigorous, Clinically Relevant Large Animal Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia: What Have We Learned in 20 Years?Methods and protocols · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo (1) characterise the chemical and ultra-structural composition of ameroid constrictors, at a native state and during in vitro expansion and (2) determine the presence of irritant compounds at the surface or within the bulk of the constrictor.
methodsTwelve sterile, commercially packaged ameroid constrictors (3 repeats of 3.5 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and 7 mm internal diameter) were analysed by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry, Raman spectroscopy, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
resultsAmeroid constrictors have a composition commensurate with casein with little-to-no intra- or inter- constrictor variation. Microscopic analysis indicated that the topographical features of the constrictor surfaces were consistent between all constrictors. Following in vitro expansion there was a reproducible decrease in Ca+ ion content, little-to-no variation in secondary protein structure and morphological changes including the presence of surface aggregates present only at the inner surface of the ameroid constrictor. The potential irritant polydimethylsiloxane was found on the constrictor surface. A trace quantity of an ion fragment assigned as formaldehyde was detected; however, the extremely low level is thought highly unlikely to play a role as an inflammatory trigger clinically. DISCUSSION: There is a high degree of inter- and intra-constrictor homogeneity from different batches, and reproducible ultrastructural changes following in vitro expansion. Variations occur in both the surface chemistry and topography of the device during closure, which can potentially affect the biomaterial-host interface. Ameroid constrictor closure mechanism is likely involving calcium-mediated inter-protein interactions rather than the imbibition of water only.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.