Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30440002›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Feasibility of CT radiomics to predict treatment response of individual liver metastases in esophagogastric cancer patients.

Remy Klaassen, Ruben T H M Larue, Banafsche Mearadji, Stephanie O van der Woude, Jaap Stoker, Philippe Lambin, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Radiomics to predict PNI in ESCC.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Focal Lesions of the Liver and Radiomics: What Do We Know?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prognostic Evaluation Based on Dual-TimeJournal of oncology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Radiomics in liver diseases: Current progress and future opportunities.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2020
    Review
  19. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Remy KlaassenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8706-5605
Ruben T H M LarueThe D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2232-7795
Banafsche MearadjiAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stephanie O van der WoudeAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jaap StokerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Philippe LambinThe D-Lab: Decision Support for Precision Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hanneke W M van LaarhovenAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study we investigate a CT radiomics approach to predict response to chemotherapy of individual liver metastases in patients with esophagogastric cancer (EGC). In eighteen patients with metastatic EGC treated with chemotherapy, all liver metastases were manually delineated in 3D on the pre-treatment and evaluation CT. From the pre-treatment CT scans 370 radiomics features were extracted per lesion. Random forest (RF) models were generated to discriminate partial responding (PR, >65% volume decrease, including 100% volume decrease), and complete remission (CR, only 100% volume decrease) lesions from other lesions. RF-models were build using a leave one out strategy where all lesions of a single patient were removed from the dataset and used as validation set for a model trained on the lesions of the remaining patients. This process was repeated for all patients, resulting in 18 trained models and one validation set for both the PR and CR datasets. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics with corresponding area under the curve (AUC). In total 196 liver metastases were delineated on the pre-treatment CT, of which 99 (51%) lesions showed a decrease in size of more than 65% (PR). From the PR set a total of 47 (47% of RL, 24% of initial) lesions were no longer detected in CT scan 2 (CR). The RF-model for PR lesions showed an average training AUC of 0.79 (range: 0.74-0.83) and 0.65 (95% ci: 0.57-0.73) for the combined validation set. The RF-model for CR lesions had an average training AUC of 0.87 (range: 0.83-0.90) and 0.79 (95% ci 0.72-0.87) for the validation set. Our findings show that individual response of liver metastases varies greatly within and between patients. A CT radiomics approach shows potential in discriminating responding from non-responding liver metastases based on the pre-treatment CT scan, although further validation in an independent patient cohort is needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsLiver NeoplasmsModels, BiologicalStomach NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedCapecitabineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesCapecitabine

Identifiers

PMID30440002
PMCPMC6237370
OpenAlexW2901680650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.