ArticlePloS one2018
Feasibility of CT radiomics to predict treatment response of individual liver metastases in esophagogastric cancer patients.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advanced analytics and artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of radiomics predicting response to treatment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Pooled it
- Prediction of distant metastasis in esophageal cancer using a radiomics-clinical model.European journal of medical research · 2022Trial
- Radiomics to predict PNI in ESCC.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Detection of circulating tumor cells that predicts the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Multicentre validation of CT grey-level co-occurrence matrix features for overall survival in primary oesophageal adenocarcinoma.European radiology · 2024Article
- Focal Lesions of the Liver and Radiomics: What Do We Know?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Role of Machine Learning in Precision Oncology: Applications in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Cancers · 2022Review
- Radiomic assessment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a critical review of 18F-FDG PET/CT, PET/MRI and CT.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
- A Multi-Center Study of CT-Based Neck Nodal Radiomics for Predicting an Adaptive Radiotherapy Trigger of Ill-Fitted Thermoplastic Masks in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rectal MRI radiomics for predicting pathological complete response: Where we are.Clinical imaging · 2022Review
- Article
- Prognostic Evaluation Based on Dual-TimeJournal of oncology · 2022Article
- Impact of radiogenomics in esophageal cancer on clinical outcomes: A pilot study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Prediction of Coronary Calcification and Stenosis: Role of Radiomics From Low-Dose CT.Academic radiology · 2021Article
- Multi-Organ Omics-Based Prediction for Adaptive Radiation Therapy Eligibility in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Imaging of Gastric Cancer: Current Applications and Future Direction.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Radiomics of Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2020Review
- Radiomics in liver diseases: Current progress and future opportunities.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2020Review
- Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- CT Radiomics, Radiologists, and Clinical Information in Predicting Outcome of Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia.Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study we investigate a CT radiomics approach to predict response to chemotherapy of individual liver metastases in patients with esophagogastric cancer (EGC). In eighteen patients with metastatic EGC treated with chemotherapy, all liver metastases were manually delineated in 3D on the pre-treatment and evaluation CT. From the pre-treatment CT scans 370 radiomics features were extracted per lesion. Random forest (RF) models were generated to discriminate partial responding (PR, >65% volume decrease, including 100% volume decrease), and complete remission (CR, only 100% volume decrease) lesions from other lesions. RF-models were build using a leave one out strategy where all lesions of a single patient were removed from the dataset and used as validation set for a model trained on the lesions of the remaining patients. This process was repeated for all patients, resulting in 18 trained models and one validation set for both the PR and CR datasets. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics with corresponding area under the curve (AUC). In total 196 liver metastases were delineated on the pre-treatment CT, of which 99 (51%) lesions showed a decrease in size of more than 65% (PR). From the PR set a total of 47 (47% of RL, 24% of initial) lesions were no longer detected in CT scan 2 (CR). The RF-model for PR lesions showed an average training AUC of 0.79 (range: 0.74-0.83) and 0.65 (95% ci: 0.57-0.73) for the combined validation set. The RF-model for CR lesions had an average training AUC of 0.87 (range: 0.83-0.90) and 0.79 (95% ci 0.72-0.87) for the validation set. Our findings show that individual response of liver metastases varies greatly within and between patients. A CT radiomics approach shows potential in discriminating responding from non-responding liver metastases based on the pre-treatment CT scan, although further validation in an independent patient cohort is needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.