Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30439998›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Feasibility assessment of an ergonomic baby wrap for kangaroo mother care: A mixed methods study from Nepal.

Kusum Thapa, Diwakar Mohan, Emma Williams, Chandra Rai, Sangita Bista, Sangeeta Mishra, Pawan Kumar Hamal

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kusum ThapaMaternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7403-7429
Diwakar MohanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7532-366X
Emma WilliamsMaternal and Child Survival Program/Jhpiego, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Chandra RaiJhpiego/Nepal, Oasis Building, Patan Dhoka, Lalitpur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sangita BistaJhpiego/Nepal, Oasis Building, Patan Dhoka, Lalitpur, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sangeeta MishraKoshi Zonal Hospital, Biratnagar, Nepal.
Pawan Kumar HamalNational Academy of Medical Sciences, National Trauma Center, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Biratnagar Eye Hospital · NPJohns Hopkins University · USNational Academy of Medical Sciences · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKangaroo mother care, an evidence based practice and a national policy for management of low birth weight newborns in Nepal, is not widely practiced. This implementation research study aimed to explore the consumer preference and acceptability of the traditional and a new ergonomic wrap on the continuation of kangaroo mother care in the facility and community following discharge.

methodsA mixed method feasibility study was done from May to October 2015. Ninety-six families of stable low birth weight newborns weighing 1800 to 2499 grams were counseled and taught to practice kangaroo mother care using both wraps. They were randomized into two groups of 48 with one group trying out the traditional wrap for the first six hours and the new wrap for the next six, and vice versa. Mothers were allowed to choose between the wraps for continuation of kangaroo mother care at the facility and post discharge. They were followed up telephonically weekly over 28 days postpartum to ascertain practice of kangaroo mother care. In-depth interviews with mothers (n = 12) and focus group discussions with health workers (n = 16) further evaluated the intervention. Descriptive statistics are presented for the quantitative part of the study.

resultsMothers in the two groups chose the new wrap with no significant difference (81.3% vs 89.6%, p = 0.24). Of the 96 randomized mothers, 85% chose the new wrap. During the hospital stay, six mothers dropped out and remaining 90 mothers who were discharged with the intention of continuing Kangaroo Mother Care, 78 and 12 mothers did so with the new and traditional wrap respectively. New wrap users (429.1 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 351.7-470.3) performed skin-to-skin contact for an extra 77.4 hours overall than traditional wrap (351.7 hours, 95%CI: 259.3-444) users from first day to 28 day postpartum. Health workers and mothers reported positive experience with the new wrap as it was easy to wear without assistance, secure and flexible to move around in kangaroo mother care position.

conclusionsInvolvement of mothers and families with provision of ergonomic wraps showed improvement in kangaroo mother care practice during hospital stay and at home.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightAttitude of Health PersonnelEducation, NonprofessionalEquipment DesignErgonomicsFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInterviews as TopicKangaroo-Mother Care MethodMaleMothers

Identifiers

PMID30439998
PMCPMC6237334
OpenAlexW2901554664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.