Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30439958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The #chatsafe project. Developing guidelines to help young people communicate safely about suicide on social media: A Delphi study.

Jo Robinson, Nicole T M Hill, Pinar Thorn, Rikki Battersby, Zoe Teh, Nicola J Reavley, Jane Pirkis, Michelle Lamblin, Simon Rice, Jaelea Skehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The #chatsafe Youth Participation Model: Evaluating Participatory Workshops Involving Young People in the Design of Suicide Prevention Initiatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Developing Language and Image Use Guidance for Communicating About Suicide, Mental Health Concerns and Alcohol and Other Drug Concerns: An Australian Delphi Study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jo RobinsonOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-918X
Nicole T M HillOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1987-5299
Pinar ThornOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.
Rikki BattersbyOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.
Zoe TehOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.
Nicola J ReavleyCentre for Mental Health, The Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jane PirkisCentre for Mental Health, The Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle LamblinOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.
Simon RiceOrygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Victoria, Australia.
Jaelea SkehanEverymind, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany countries have developed guidelines advocating for responsible reporting of suicidal behaviour in traditional media. However, the increasing popularity of social media, particularly among young people, means that complementary guidelines designed to facilitate safe peer-peer communication are required. The aim of this study was to develop a set of evidence informed guidelines to assist young people to communicate about suicide via social media with the input of young people as active participants of the study.

methodsSystematic searches of the peer-reviewed and grey literature were conducted resulting in a 284-item questionnaire identifying strategies for safe communication about suicide online. The questionnaire was delivered over two rounds to two panels consisting of Australian youth advocates; and international suicide prevention researchers and media and communications specialists. Items were rerated if they were endorsed by 70-79.5% of both panels, or if 80% or more of one panel rated the item as essential or important. All items that were endorsed as essential or important by at least 80% of both panels were included in the final guidelines.

resultsA total of 173 items were included in the final guidelines. These items were organised into the following five sections: 1) Before you post anything online about suicide; 2) Sharing your own thoughts, feelings, or experience with suicidal behaviour online; 3) Communicating about someone you know who is affected by suicidal thoughts, feelings or behaviours; 4) Responding to someone who may be suicidal; 5) Memorial websites, pages and closed groups to honour the deceased. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to develop a set of evidence-informed guidelines to support young people to talk safely about suicide on social media. It is hoped that they will be a useful resource for young people and those who support them (e.g., parents, teachers, community workers and health professionals).

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicSocial MediaAdolescentAdultAustraliaCommunicationCommunity ParticipationDelphi TechniqueEvidence-Based PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansSuicideYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30439958
PMCPMC6237326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.